Introduction

In the dynamic landscape of India’s rapidly evolving economy, the principles of fair competition and trade practices play a pivotal role in fostering economic growth, protecting consumer interests, and ensuring a level playing field for businesses. At the heart of India’s competition regulation framework stands the Competition Commission of India (CCI), a statutory body established to promote and sustain competition in markets, protect the interests of consumers, and ensure freedom of trade. This article delves into the multifaceted aspects of competition and fair trade in India, exploring the historical context, the establishment and role of the CCI, the regulatory framework governing competition, and the landmark cases that have shaped the interpretation and application of competition law in the country.

Historical Context and Evolution

The journey of competition law in India can be traced back to the pre-independence era, with the Swadeshi movement emphasizing the need for economic self-reliance and fair market practices. However, the formal legal framework for competition regulation began to take shape in the post-independence period.

The Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act (MRTP Act) of 1969 marked the first significant step towards regulating monopolies and promoting competition in India. This Act was born out of the recommendations of the Monopolies Inquiry Commission, which highlighted the concentration of economic power in certain industrial houses. The MRTP Act aimed to control monopolies, prohibit restrictive trade practices, and prevent the concentration of economic power to the common detriment.

While the MRTP Act served its purpose for several decades, the economic liberalization of 1991 brought new challenges and opportunities. The opening up of the Indian economy to global competition necessitated a fresh approach to competition regulation. Recognizing this need, the government appointed a high-level committee chaired by S.V.S. Raghavan in 1999 to examine the relevance of the MRTP Act in the changed economic scenario and suggest a modern competition law.

Based on the recommendations of the Raghavan Committee, the Competition Act was enacted in 2002, laying the foundation for a new era in competition regulation in India. However, the Act faced legal challenges, leading to amendments in 2007 and 2009. The Competition Commission of India, established under this Act, became fully functional in 2009, marking the beginning of a robust and modern competition regime in the country.

The Competition Commission of India: Establishment and Mandate

The Competition Commission of India (CCI) was established under the Competition Act, 2002, with the primary objective of eliminating practices having an adverse effect on competition, promoting and sustaining competition in markets, protecting the interests of consumers, and ensuring freedom of trade carried on by other participants in markets in India.

Section 7 of the Competition Act, 2002, provides for the establishment of the CCI:

“The Central Government shall, by notification, establish a Commission to be known as the “Competition Commission of India”.”

This provision underscores the statutory nature of the CCI and its establishment as an independent regulatory body.

The mandate of the CCI, as outlined in Section 18 of the Act, is comprehensive:

“Subject to the provisions of this Act, it shall be the duty of the Commission to eliminate practices having adverse effect on competition, promote and sustain competition, protect the interests of consumers and ensure freedom of trade carried on by other participants, in markets in India.”

This mandate empowers the CCI to take a proactive role in shaping the competitive landscape of the Indian economy.

The CCI’s functions, as detailed in Section 19 of the Act, include:

Inquiry into certain agreements and dominant position of enterprise Inquiry into combinations Power to grant interim relief Power to impose penalty for non-furnishing of information on combinations

These functions provide the CCI with the necessary tools to investigate anti-competitive practices, regulate mergers and acquisitions, and enforce competition law effectively.

Regulatory Framework Governing Competition and Fair Trade in India

The regulatory framework governing competition and fair trade in India is primarily based on the Competition Act, 2002, and the various regulations issued under it. This framework addresses three main areas of anti-competitive practices: anti-competitive agreements, abuse of dominant position, and regulation of combinations.

Anti-Competitive Agreements

Section 3 of the Competition Act deals with anti-competitive agreements. It states:

“No enterprise or association of enterprises or person or association of persons shall enter into any agreement in respect of production, supply, distribution, storage, acquisition or control of goods or provision of services, which causes or is likely to cause an appreciable adverse effect on competition within India.”

This provision prohibits both horizontal agreements (between competitors) and vertical agreements (between entities at different levels of the production chain) that have an appreciable adverse effect on competition. The Act provides for certain exemptions, such as joint ventures that increase efficiency in production, supply, distribution, storage, acquisition, or control of goods or provision of services.

Abuse of Dominant Position

Section 4 of the Act addresses the abuse of dominant position. It states:

“No enterprise or group shall abuse its dominant position.”

The Act defines dominant position as

“a position of strength, enjoyed by an enterprise, in the relevant market, in India, which enables it to operate independently of competitive forces prevailing in the relevant market; or affect its competitors or consumers or the relevant market in its favour.”

This provision prohibits practices such as imposing unfair conditions, predatory pricing, limiting production of goods or provision of services, and using dominance in one market to enter into or protect another relevant market.

Regulation of Combinations

Sections 5 and 6 of the Act deal with the regulation of combinations (mergers, amalgamations, and acquisitions). Section 6(1) states:

“No person or enterprise shall enter into a combination which causes or is likely to cause an appreciable adverse effect on competition within the relevant market in India and such a combination shall be void.”

The Act provides thresholds based on assets and turnover, beyond which combinations need to be notified to the CCI for approval. The CCI assesses these combinations to ensure they do not cause an appreciable adverse effect on competition.

Case Laws and Judicial Interpretations

The interpretation and application of competition and fair Trade in India have been significantly shaped by various landmark cases decided by the CCI and the appellate authorities. Some of the notable cases include:

MCX Stock Exchange Ltd. vs. National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. (2011)

This case dealt with the abuse of dominant position in the stock exchange market. The CCI held that the National Stock Exchange (NSE) had abused its dominant position by engaging in predatory pricing in the currency derivatives market. The CCI observed:

“Predatory pricing, in this case, was a means to distort competition in the relevant market with the objective of eliminating competitors… Such conduct of NSE amounts to unfair pricing in contravention of the provisions of Section 4(2)(a)(ii) of the Act.”

This judgment set a precedent for the interpretation of predatory pricing under Indian competition law.

Belaire Owners’ Association vs. DLF Limited (2011)

This case addressed the issue of abuse of dominant position in the real estate sector. The CCI found DLF Limited guilty of imposing unfair conditions on apartment buyers. The Commission stated:

“The conduct of DLF in imposing unfair conditions in the Agreement with buyers is in violation of Section 4(2)(a)(i) of the Competition Act… The Commission is of the view that the penalty should be sufficient to have deterrent effect on DLF and it should desist from continuing this unfair conduct.”

This case highlighted the application of competition law in protecting consumer interests in the real estate sector.

Matrimony.com Ltd. vs. Google LLC & Ors. (2018)

This landmark case dealt with the abuse of dominant position by Google in the online search market. The CCI imposed a fine of ₹135.86 crore on Google for “search bias” and abusing its dominant position. The Commission observed:

“Google was found to be indulging in practices of search bias and by doing so, it causes harm to its competitors as well as to users… Google was leveraging its dominance in the market for online general web search, to strengthen its position in the market for online syndicate search services.”

This case set a significant precedent for the regulation of digital markets under Indian competition law.

Recent Developments and Initiatives

In recent years, the competition landscape in India has witnessed several significant developments, many of which have been spearheaded or addressed by the CCI:

• Digital Markets

Recognizing the unique challenges posed by digital markets, the CCI has been proactive in addressing competition issues in this sector. In 2020, the CCI released a market study on e-commerce in India, highlighting various competition concerns in the sector. The study noted:

“Lack of platform neutrality, unfair platform-to-business contract terms, exclusive contracts between platforms and sellers/service providers, platform price parity restrictions and deep discounts were identified as major issues.”

This study has paved the way for more focused regulation of digital markets in India.

• Green Channel for Merger Approvals

In 2019, the CCI introduced the “Green Channel” for automatic approval of certain combinations. This initiative aims to fast-track the approval process for mergers and acquisitions that are unlikely to cause any appreciable adverse effect on competition. The CCI stated in its press release:

“The Green Channel is aimed to sustain and promote a speedy, transparent and accountable review of combination cases, strike a balance between facilitating ease of doing business in India and ensuring enforcement of competition law.”

This initiative has been welcomed by the business community as it reduces the regulatory burden for certain types of combinations.

• Leniency Program

The CCI has been actively promoting its leniency program to detect and deter cartelization. The program offers reduced penalties to entities that provide vital information about cartels. In the Zinc Carbon Dry Cell Batteries Market case (2018), the CCI granted significant reductions in penalties to leniency applicants, stating:

“The Commission considers it appropriate to grant the applicants reduction in penalty considering the stage at which the applicant approached the Commission, the evidence already in possession of the Commission, the quality of the information provided and the entire facts and circumstances of the case.”

This case demonstrated the effectiveness of the leniency program in uncovering cartel behavior.

Challenges and Future Prospects

Despite its significant strides, the competition regime in India faces several challenges:

• Balancing Regulation and Innovation

With the rapid evolution of technology and business models, particularly in the digital sector, the CCI faces the challenge of balancing the need for regulation with the imperative of fostering innovation. The Commission needs to develop nuanced approaches that address anti-competitive practices without stifling technological advancements and new business models.

• Strengthening Investigation and Enforcement Capabilities

As markets become more complex and global, the CCI needs to continually enhance its investigative and enforcement capabilities. This includes developing expertise in specialized areas like digital markets, intellectual property rights, and cross-border transactions.

• Harmonizing with Global Competition Regimes

In an increasingly interconnected global economy, the CCI faces the challenge of harmonizing its approach with international competition regimes. This is particularly crucial in cases involving multinational corporations and cross-border transactions.

• Addressing Sector-Specific Competition Issues

Different sectors of the economy may require tailored approaches to competition regulation. The CCI needs to develop sector-specific expertise and guidelines to address unique competition issues in areas like telecommunications, pharmaceuticals, and e-commerce.

To address these challenges, the CCI and the government have been taking various steps:

• Proposed Amendments to the Competition Act

The government has proposed amendments to the Competition Act to address emerging issues in competition law. These amendments aim to introduce provisions for dealing with new-age markets, revise merger thresholds, and introduce a settlement mechanism for certain types of anti-competitive conduct.

• Capacity Building and International Cooperation

The CCI has been focusing on capacity building through training programs, workshops, and international collaborations. It has signed Memoranda of Understanding with several international competition authorities to facilitate knowledge sharing and cooperation in enforcement.

• Market Studies and Advocacy

The CCI has been conducting market studies in various sectors to gain insights into competition dynamics and identify potential areas of concern. These studies inform the Commission’s enforcement priorities and advocacy efforts.

Conclusion

The competition and fair trade in India, under the stewardship of the Competition Commission of India, has evolved significantly since the enactment of the Competition Act in 2002. The CCI has played a crucial role in promoting fair competition, protecting consumer interests, and fostering a culture of compliance among businesses.

The journey of competition law in India reflects the country’s economic transformation – from a controlled economy to a liberalized one, and now navigating the complexities of the digital age. The CCI’s approach has evolved from being primarily enforcement-oriented to adopting a more nuanced, market-friendly stance that balances the need for regulation with the imperatives of economic growth and innovation.

As India aspires to become a $5 trillion economy, the role of effective competition regulation becomes even more critical. The CCI will need to continue adapting its strategies and tools to address emerging challenges, particularly in dynamic sectors like e-commerce, digital platforms, and technology-driven markets.

The future of competition regulation in India lies in striking the right balance between enforcement and advocacy, between protecting competition and fostering innovation, and between national economic interests and global harmonization. As the CCI continues to evolve and refine its approach, it has the potential to play a pivotal role in shaping India’s economic landscape, ensuring that the benefits of economic growth are equitably distributed and that markets remain competitive, innovative, and consumer-friendly.

The journey of competition law in India is an ongoing one, reflective of the country’s dynamic economic environment. As new challenges emerge and markets evolve, the principles of fair competition enshrined in the Competition Act, and upheld by the CCI, will continue to be a cornerstone of India’s economic policy, playing a crucial role in the country’s journey towards becoming a global economic powerhouse.

The post Competition and Fair Trade in India: The Role of the Competition Commission of India appeared first on Bhatt & Joshi Associates.

The Competition Commission of India (CCI) stands as India’s premier competition regulatory authority, established as a statutory body under the Competition Act, 2002. Following the economic liberalization of 1991, India recognized the urgent need for a robust competition framework to prevent monopolistic practices and ensure fair market competition. The CCI became fully operational in May 2009, marking a significant milestone in India’s economic regulatory landscape [1].

The establishment of the CCI represented a paradigm shift from the earlier Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969, which had become inadequate in addressing the complexities of modern market dynamics. The Competition Act, 2002, was subsequently amended by the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007, and later by the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2009, to strengthen the regulatory framework and enhance the CCI’s operational effectiveness [2].

Legislative Framework and Legal Foundation

The Competition Act, 2002, serves as the cornerstone legislation governing competition law in India. The Act was conceived to prevent practices having adverse effects on competition, promote and sustain competition in markets, protect consumer interests, and ensure freedom of trade carried on by other participants in markets of India. The Act has undergone significant amendments, with the most recent being the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2023, which introduced crucial changes including deal value thresholds and enhanced powers for the CCI [3].

Under Section 7 of the Competition Act, 2002, the CCI was established as a statutory body corporate, having perpetual succession and a common seal. The Act empowers the CCI with extensive jurisdiction over all matters relating to competition, including anti-competitive agreements, abuse of dominant position, and combinations such as mergers and acquisitions. The legislative intent behind the Act was to create a modern competition law regime that could effectively address the challenges of a liberalized economy while ensuring consumer welfare and market efficiency.

The Competition (Amendment) Act, 2023, introduced transformative changes to the regulatory landscape. The amendment established deal value thresholds, requiring transactions exceeding INR 2,000 crore to seek prior CCI approval, regardless of traditional asset and turnover thresholds. This change addresses the regulatory gaps in digital economy transactions where asset-light business models were previously escaping competition scrutiny.

Composition and Structure of CCI

The Competition Commission of India comprises a Chairperson and not less than two and not more than six members, as stipulated under Section 8 of the Competition Act, 2002. Currently, the CCI operates with a full complement of seven members, including the Chairperson, all appointed by the Central Government [4]. The current Chairperson is Ravneet Kaur, who leads the Commission with extensive experience in competition matters.

The appointment process for CCI members follows a structured selection mechanism involving a Selection Committee. As per Section 9 of the Act, the Chairperson and every member of the Commission must be persons of ability, integrity, and standing who have been or are qualified to be judges of High Courts, or who have special knowledge of and professional experience of not less than fifteen years in international trade, economics, business, commerce, law, finance, accountancy, management, industry, public affairs, or administration.

The tenure of the Chairperson and members is five years from the date of assumption of office, or until they attain the age of sixty-five years, whichever is earlier. This structure ensures continuity in decision-making while preventing potential conflicts of interest through defined tenure periods. The Commission operates as a quasi-judicial body, possessing powers similar to civil courts in certain procedural matters, including the power to summon and enforce attendance of witnesses, require discovery and production of documents, and receive evidence on affidavits.

Functions and Powers of CCI

The CCI’s mandate encompasses three primary functions: eliminating anti-competitive practices, regulating combinations, and promoting competition advocacy. Under Section 18 of the Competition Act, the CCI is duty-bound to eliminate practices having adverse effects on competition, promote and sustain competition, protect consumer interests, and ensure freedom of trade in Indian markets.

The Commission’s investigative powers are substantial and carefully defined under the Act. Section 26 empowers the CCI to inquire into anti-competitive agreements and abuse of dominant position upon receiving information from any person, consumer, or trade association. The investigation process involves the Director General, who conducts detailed investigations and submits reports to the Commission. The CCI can impose penalties up to ten percent of the average turnover of the enterprise for the last three preceding financial years for anti-competitive practices.

In matters of combinations, the CCI exercises jurisdiction over mergers, acquisitions, and amalgamations that meet specified thresholds. The recent amendments have expanded this jurisdiction significantly. Previously, combinations were assessed based on asset and turnover thresholds. The 2023 amendment introduced deal value thresholds, bringing transactions valued above INR 2,000 crore under CCI scrutiny, provided the target entity has substantial business operations in India.

The CCI’s regulatory approach emphasizes market efficiency and consumer welfare. The Commission analyzes market dynamics, competitive landscape, and potential impacts on consumers before making determinations. This economic approach ensures that regulatory interventions are justified and proportionate to market realities.

Anti-Competitive Practices and Regulatory Response

The Competition Act identifies two primary categories of anti-competitive practices: anti-competitive agreements under Section 3 and abuse of dominant position under Section 4. Anti-competitive agreements include horizontal agreements such as cartels involving price-fixing, market sharing, and output restrictions, as well as vertical agreements that may cause appreciable adverse effects on competition.

The CCI has developed sophisticated analytical frameworks for assessing anti-competitive practices. In cartel investigations, the Commission employs economic analysis to determine market allocation, price coordination, and other restrictive practices. The leniency provisions under the Competition Commission of India (Lesser Penalty) Regulations, 2009, provide incentives for enterprises to voluntarily disclose cartel activities in exchange for reduced penalties.

Recent enforcement actions demonstrate the CCI’s evolving approach to competition violations. The Commission has been particularly active in addressing digital market challenges, where traditional competition analysis requires adaptation to new business models. Platform markets, data-driven business strategies, and network effects present unique analytical challenges that the CCI has been addressing through specialized expertise and international best practices.

The abuse of dominant position provisions require careful market definition and dominance assessment. The CCI analyzes market share, barriers to entry, buyer power, and other relevant factors to determine dominance. Once dominance is established, the Commission examines whether the entity has abused its position through predatory pricing, exclusive dealing, tying arrangements, or other restrictive practices.

Merger Control and Combination Regulation

Merger control represents a significant aspect of CCI’s jurisdiction, designed to prevent combinations that may cause appreciable adverse effects on competition. The regulatory framework requires mandatory notification for combinations exceeding specified thresholds, enabling the CCI to review transactions before implementation.

The traditional thresholds under Section 5 of the Act include asset-based criteria (assets worth INR 1,000 crore or more for acquiring entities, and INR 350 crore for target entities) and turnover-based criteria (turnover of INR 3,000 crore or more for acquiring entities, and INR 1,000 crore for target entities). The 2023 amendment introduced deal value thresholds, capturing transactions worth INR 2,000 crore or more where the target has substantial business operations in India [5].

The CCI’s merger review process involves detailed economic analysis of market concentration, competitive effects, efficiency considerations, and consumer welfare implications. The Commission applies the Substantial Lessening of Competition (SLC) test, examining whether a proposed combination is likely to cause or likely to cause appreciable adverse effect on competition within the relevant market in India.

The regulatory review timeline provides certainty to businesses while ensuring thorough analysis. The CCI must form a prima facie opinion within thirty working days of receiving complete information. If detailed investigation is required, the Commission has an additional ninety working days to make its final determination, extendable by a maximum of thirty days in exceptional circumstances.

Competition Advocacy and Market Development

Beyond enforcement activities, the CCI plays a crucial role in competition advocacy, promoting competitive markets through policy recommendations, market studies, and stakeholder engagement. Section 49 of the Competition Act empowers the CCI to provide opinions to statutory authorities on competition issues, contributing to broader economic policy formulation.

The Commission regularly conducts market studies to understand competitive dynamics in various sectors. These studies inform policy recommendations and help identify potential competition concerns before they crystallize into violations. Recent market studies have covered sectors such as e-commerce, telecommunications, pharmaceuticals, and financial services, providing valuable insights for policymakers and market participants.

The CCI’s advocacy efforts extend to capacity building and awareness creation. The Commission organizes training programs for government officials, judicial officers, and legal practitioners to enhance understanding of competition principles. International cooperation through bilateral agreements and multilateral forums helps align Indian competition law with global best practices while addressing cross-border competition issues.

Judicial Review and Appellate Mechanism

The competition law framework includes robust judicial review mechanisms to ensure accountability and legal certainty. The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) serves as the appellate authority for CCI decisions under Section 53A of the Competition Act. This appellate mechanism provides an essential check on CCI’s exercise of power while ensuring specialized expertise in competition matters.

The Supreme Court of India exercises ultimate appellate jurisdiction over competition matters through appeals from NCLAT decisions. This hierarchical review structure ensures that competition law develops consistently with broader legal principles while maintaining specialized expertise at the tribunal level.

Recent judicial decisions have clarified important aspects of competition law interpretation and application. Courts have addressed issues such as the scope of CCI’s jurisdiction, the standard of evidence required for competition violations, and the relationship between competition law and sectoral regulations. These precedents contribute to the evolution of Indian competition jurisprudence and provide guidance for future cases.

Contemporary Challenges and Digital Economy

The digital economy presents unprecedented challenges for competition regulation worldwide, and India is no exception. Platform markets, data advantages, network effects, and algorithmic decision-making require sophisticated analytical approaches that go beyond traditional competition analysis. The CCI has been adapting its enforcement approach to address these challenges effectively.

Digital market investigations have revealed complex competitive dynamics where traditional market definition and dominance assessment may require modification. Multi-sided platforms, zero-price markets, and data-driven business models challenge conventional economic analysis. The CCI has been developing expertise in these areas while engaging with international competition authorities to share experiences and best practices.

The 2023 amendments partially address digital economy challenges through deal value thresholds, capturing asset-light digital transactions that previously escaped merger review. However, ongoing challenges include addressing data monopolization, algorithmic coordination, and platform self-preferencing, which require continued regulatory evolution.

International Cooperation and Best Practices

The CCI actively engages in international cooperation to enhance its enforcement capabilities and align with global competition law developments. Bilateral cooperation agreements with competition authorities facilitate information sharing, technical assistance, and coordinated enforcement actions in cross-border cases.

Participation in multilateral forums such as the International Competition Network (ICN), Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), and United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) enables knowledge sharing and policy coordination. These engagements help Indian competition law evolve in line with international best practices while addressing domestic market specificities.

The CCI has been particularly active in developing country cooperation, sharing its experiences in competition law implementation and learning from other emerging economy challenges. This South-South cooperation contributes to global competition law development while addressing common challenges faced by developing economies.

Future Prospects and Regulatory Evolution

Looking forward, the CCI faces several challenges and opportunities in maintaining effective competition regulation. The continuing digital transformation of the economy requires ongoing regulatory adaptation and analytical sophistication. Emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence, blockchain, and Internet of Things present new competitive dynamics that competition law must address.

The regulatory framework may require further amendments to address contemporary challenges effectively. Areas for potential development include enhanced powers for market investigations, improved coordination with sectoral regulators, and strengthened international cooperation mechanisms. The CCI’s institutional capacity building remains crucial for meeting these evolving challenges [6].

The Commission’s role in promoting economic development through competitive markets continues to evolve. As India pursues ambitious economic growth targets, effective competition regulation becomes increasingly important for ensuring market efficiency, innovation incentives, and consumer welfare. The CCI’s contribution to this broader economic agenda requires continued institutional strengthening and stakeholder engagement.

Conclusion

The Competition Commission of India has established itself as a credible and effective competition authority since its inception. The legislative framework provided by the Competition Act, 2002, and its subsequent amendments creates a robust foundation for competition regulation in India’s evolving economy. The Commission’s enforcement record, advocacy efforts, and institutional development demonstrate its commitment to promoting competitive markets and protecting consumer interests.

The recent amendments to the Competition Act reflect the dynamic nature of competition law and the need for continuous adaptation to market realities. The introduction of deal value thresholds, enhanced investigative powers, and streamlined procedures position the CCI to address contemporary competition challenges effectively.

As India continues its economic transformation, the CCI’s role becomes increasingly significant in ensuring that markets work efficiently and competitively. The Commission’s success in balancing enforcement rigor with business certainty, while promoting innovation and economic growth, will determine its effectiveness in achieving the Competition Act’s objectives of protecting competition, consumers, and trade freedom in Indian markets.

The future of competition regulation in India depends on the CCI’s ability to evolve with changing market dynamics while maintaining its commitment to evidence-based decision-making and stakeholder engagement. Through continued institutional development, international cooperation, and regulatory innovation, the CCI can contribute significantly to India’s economic development goals while ensuring fair and competitive markets for all participants.

References

[1] Competition Commission of India. (2024). About CCI. 

[2] Ministry of Corporate Affairs. (2007). Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007. 

[3] Government of India. (2023). Competition (Amendment) Act, 2023. Retrieved from https://www.investindia.gov.in/team-india-blogs/competition-amendment-act-2023-significance-and-implications-competition 

[4] Competition Commission of India. (2025). Organization Structure. 

[5] S&R Law. (2023). Changes to the Competition Act, 2002. Retrieved from https://www.snrlaw.in/changes-to-the-competition-act-2002/ 

[6] Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas. (2021). Competition Law Developments in India. Retrieved from https://competition.cyrilamarchandblogs.com/ 

Authorized  by Vishal Davda

The post The Competition Commission of India: Regulatory Framework and Legal Landscape appeared first on Bhatt & Joshi Associates.