<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Section 119 IT Act vs Section 7 D&#038;C Act: Why CBDT Circulars Are Binding in Nature But DCC Guidelines Are Not	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bhattandjoshiassociates.com/section-119-it-act-vs-section-7-dc-act-why-cbdt-circulars-are-binding-in-nature-but-dcc-guidelines-are-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bhattandjoshiassociates.com/section-119-it-act-vs-section-7-dc-act-why-cbdt-circulars-are-binding-in-nature-but-dcc-guidelines-are-not/</link>
	<description>Best High Court Advocates &#38; Lawyers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 09:36:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
</channel>
</rss>
