<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Supreme Court Larger Bench Rule: When a 3-Judge Bench Recalls a 2-Judge Bench – India&#8217;s Unresolved Doctrine on Co-Equal Bench Powers	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bhattandjoshiassociates.com/supreme-court-larger-bench-rule-when-a-3-judge-bench-recalls-a-2-judge-bench-indias-unresolved-doctrine-on-co-equal-bench-powers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bhattandjoshiassociates.com/supreme-court-larger-bench-rule-when-a-3-judge-bench-recalls-a-2-judge-bench-indias-unresolved-doctrine-on-co-equal-bench-powers/</link>
	<description>Best High Court Advocates &#38; Lawyers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2026 12:01:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
</channel>
</rss>
