Introduction

The demurrage and detention waiver regime under Indian customs law is not a blanket entitlement. Whether a waiver will actually be granted — or whether the CCSP or carrier can successfully resist it — often depends on a single, critical question: Was the importer at fault for the detention?

This fault-based divide has emerged from a series of important judicial decisions from the Supreme Court, the Delhi High Court, the Madras High Court, and CESTAT. Understanding where a given case falls on this spectrum is the most practically important skill for any lawyer or importer navigating demurrage and detention disputes in India.

The Central Legal Question

In every demurrage/detention waiver dispute, courts and tribunals ask: What caused the detention? And who caused it?

• If detention was caused by the importer’s own action (misdeclaration, misclassification, smuggling, deliberate fraud) → waiver may be refused; the CCSP/carrier is not required to subsidise the importer’s misconduct.
• If detention was caused solely by customs/government action (DRI/SIIB investigation initiated on intelligence, customs hold for verification) and the importer was innocent → waiver is mandatory; the CCSP/carrier cannot resist.
• If detention was caused by customs action but the importer was ultimately penalised (i.e., found to have committed some violation, even if minor) → the position is nuanced and courts have applied a fact-specific analysis.

The Foundational Supreme Court Principle

Shipping Corporation of India Ltd. v. C.L. Jain Woollen Mills (AIR 2001 SC 1806)

The Supreme Court established the foundational principle governing this area. C.L. Jain Woollen Mills imported polyester filament yarn from Korea, which was transshipped to ICD Delhi and held by CONCOR. The Customs Authorities detained the goods, deeming the import unauthorised, and ordered confiscation. The Delhi HC quashed the confiscation and directed release without demurrage charges, given the illegality of the detention.

The Supreme Court held: Importers should not be held liable for demurrage charges ONLY IF the delay in releasing goods is due to UNLAWFUL DETENTION or ILLEGAL ACTIONS by customs officials. In the specific case before it, however, the SC directed the Shipping Corporation and CONCOR to consider waiving charges if an application was filed by customs authorities — placing the ultimate financial burden on the state where the detention was due to illegal state action.

Key limitation acknowledged by the SC: Even where the carrier’s lien under the Bill of Lading is valid, the specific circumstance of illegal customs detention necessitated exemption. The SC did not hold that all demurrage is waivable in all detention scenarios — only where the detention was unlawful or illegal.

CASE 1: Innocent Importer + DRI Seizure → Waiver Mandatory

G.K. International v. Principal Commissioner of Customs (Madras HC, W.P.No.6947 of 2022, 16.06.2022)

The petitioner imported wet dates from Dubai. On customs examination, walnuts were found alongside the declared goods. SIIB (Special Intelligence and Investigation Branch) detained the goods and issued a Detention Certificate in F.No.S.Misc.343/2021-SIIB, dated 17.01.2022, directing the CCSP not to charge detention, demurrage, or container storage charges from the date of detention.

The CCS/shipping line respondents refused to release the goods without payment of charges. The Madras High Court (per Justice R. Suresh Kumar) issued a writ of mandamus directing release of goods without levy of detention, demurrage, and container storage charges from the date of detention. The Court confirmed that a SIIB detention constitutes a qualifying detention under Regulation 6(1)(l) HCCAR 2009, and the detention certificate issued is binding.

Principle Extracted: DRI/SIIB investigation detention triggers HCCAR Reg. 6(1)(l). The detention certificate binds the CCSP. The CCSP has no discretion to refuse.

CASE 2: Goods Detained for 2+ Years, No Fault of Importer → CESTAT Directs Waiver Certificate

Jethanand Rohra / M/s. Jaymco Polymers Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Mumbai, Final Order Nos. A/85436-85437/2022, decided 09.05.2022)

The appellants imported Mineral Hydrocarbon Oil. Revenue suspected misdeclaration. The goods were seized and subsequently confiscated. However, CESTAT ultimately found in favour of the appellants — the goods were freely importable, the classification was correct, and the confiscation was set aside. The goods had been lying under seizure and confiscation for more than two years, entirely without fault on the appellant’s part.

CESTAT held: ‘As the goods are lying under seizure and subsequent confiscation by the Customs Department for more than two years, for no fault of the appellant, grant of waiver of detention and demurrage charges is appropriate.’ CESTAT directed: (a) the proper authority shall issue the waiver certificate; and (b) goods shall be delivered to the appellants within two weeks.

Principle Extracted: Where goods are held under customs seizure for extended periods without the importer’s fault, CESTAT will affirmatively direct issuance of the waiver certificate — not merely permit the importer to apply for one.

CASE 3: Goods Detained, Detention Certificate Honoured — Refund of Illegally Collected Charges

M/s. Isha Exim v. Commissioner of Customs (Madras HC, W.P.No.26838 of 2018, decided 01.07.2021)

The petitioner’s goods arrived at Chennai Port. The DRI detained the goods on suspicion of misclassification of ‘Unflavoured Supari Betelnut Product known as Supari’. A Detention/Demurrage Waiver Certificate was issued by Customs in F.No.S49/340/2017-Gr.1, dated 27.10.2017, under Regulation 6(1)(l). Despite this certificate, APL India (the shipping line / authorized carrier) collected Rs.20,57,526.72 as Container Detention Charges in ‘blatant violation’ of the certificate.

The Madras HC directed the respondents to cause refund of the amount illegally collected by APL India. The Court held the detention certificate has binding statutory force — any charges collected in violation of a valid certificate are recoverable.

Principle Extracted: Charges collected in violation of a valid detention certificate are recoverable by court order. The carrier cannot retain amounts collected in breach of its statutory obligation.

CASE 4: Importer at Fault + Penalty Imposed → Waiver May Be Refused

Bhavik S. Thakkar v. Union of India (Delhi HC, W.P.(C) 982/2015, decided 14.02.2023, 2023/DHC/001046)

The petitioner imported MS Scrap which was seized by DRI on grounds of misdeclaration. After adjudication, a penalty was imposed on the petitioner. A detention certificate was issued by Customs to CONCOR (the custodian) directing waiver of Terminal Storage Charges (TSC). CONCOR refused to waive charges, citing its internal policy that waivers are not granted where penalty has been imposed on the importer.

The Delhi HC, relying on the earlier Division Bench decision in Trip Communications Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India (28.03.2014), held against the petitioner. The Court reasoned: where the importer’s own misdeclaration caused the detention, it would be inequitable to compel the CCSP to bear the resulting charges. The waiver certificate issued by customs is an ‘eligibility certificate’ — it does not, in and of itself, compel the custodian to waive charges in all cases; the custodian retains the ability to resist where the importer caused the detention.

Principle Extracted: Penalty imposed on importer for misdeclaration = importer at fault = CCSP may resist waiver. This is the key exception to the mandatory waiver rule.

CASE 5: No Formal Detention Order → No Waiver at All

Modern Line-Export v. Deputy Commissioner of Customs (Madras HC, W.P.Nos.727 & 733 of 2024, decided 07.06.2024; W.P.No.31002 of 2024, decided 11.07.2025)

A Croatian exporter’s goods arrived at Chennai Port but the Indian importer refused to take delivery. The exporter applied for re-export permission (essentially the Section 69 pathway). Re-export was initially refused. The exporter simultaneously applied for a demurrage waiver/detention certificate. The AC of Customs rejected the waiver application on the specific ground that NO seizure, detention, or confiscation order had been issued by customs authorities in respect of the goods — they were merely uncleared.

The Madras HC (2024) remanded the re-export question but on the demurrage waiver aspect, upheld the AC’s rejection as correct in principle. The 2025 order confirmed: no formal detention order = no waiver entitlement under HCCAR Regulation 6(1)(l).

Principle Extracted: Goods merely sitting uncleared at a port (because the importer refuses delivery, or re-export is pending) without any formal seizure or detention order = NO waiver. Regulation 6(1)(l) is not a general ‘goods are stuck’ waiver provision.

The Fault Matrix: Summary

Who Bears the Ultimate Cost?

When a waiver certificate is issued and the CCSP/carrier is directed not to charge the importer, a secondary question arises: Does the CCSP/carrier bear the cost, or can it recover from customs? The Supreme Court in Shipping Corporation of India (AIR 2001 SC 1806) clarified: where the detention was due to illegal state action, the carrier/custodian may seek recovery of demurrage charges from the customs authorities. This principle has practical significance in large-scale DRI investigations where significant demurrage accumulates.

Remedy After Wrongful Refusal of Waiver

If the CCSP or carrier refuses a valid detention certificate, or if customs refuses to issue a certificate when one is warranted, the importer’s remedies are:

• Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the relevant High Court — seeking a writ of mandamus to: (a) direct issuance of detention certificate; (b) direct the CCSP/carrier to honour the certificate; or (c) direct refund of charges illegally collected.
• Filing a complaint with the Commissioner of Customs for action under Regulation 13 of HCCAR 2009 / SCMTR 2018 against the non-complying CCSP/carrier.
• Representation to CBIC/DRI for intervention, particularly in major investigation cases.

Conclusion

The fault-based divide is the most practically important concept in the demurrage and detention waiver space. The law is not a blanket protection for all importers in all circumstances — it protects innocent importers from charges caused by the state’s own actions. Importers who are found to have made misdeclarations or committed violations that caused the detention face a significantly harder road. Understanding this divide — and where a given case sits on it — is essential for every customs lawyer and trade professional. Article 7, the capstone of this series, addresses the most complex scenario: goods pending Section 69 re-export that are simultaneously seized by DRI/SIIB, triggering both the re-export clearance track and the detention waiver track in parallel.

FAQ: Demurrage and Detention Waiver under HCCAR 2009 & SCMTR 2018

1. What is the key test for granting a demurrage or detention waiver under HCCAR 2009?

The central test is “who caused the detention”. If detention is due to customs action without importer fault, waiver is generally mandatory. If importer’s misconduct caused detention, waiver can be denied.

2. Is a detention certificate under HCCAR 2009 binding on shipping lines and CCSPs?

Yes. A valid detention certificate issued by Customs under Regulation 6(1)(l) is generally binding on CCSPs and carriers, and they are expected to waive charges accordingly.

3. Can a shipping line refuse a detention waiver certificate issued by Customs?

Only in limited cases. If the importer is found guilty of misdeclaration, fraud, or wrongdoing, courts have allowed CCSPs to resist waiver. Otherwise, refusal is not legally sustainable.

4. Is demurrage waiver available if goods are merely lying uncleared at the port?

No. If there is no formal detention, seizure, or confiscation order, Regulation 6(1)(l) is not triggered and waiver is not available.

5. What happens if DRI or SIIB detains goods but the importer is ultimately found innocent?

In such cases, courts have consistently held that waiver is mandatory, and CCSPs must comply with the detention certificate issued by Customs.

6. Can waiver be denied if the importer is penalised for misdeclaration?

Yes. If adjudication confirms importer wrongdoing and penalty is imposed, courts have held that CCSPs may lawfully refuse waiver, as detention is attributable to the importer.

7. What if demurrage is collected despite a valid waiver certificate?

Any charges collected in violation of a valid detention certificate are recoverable, and courts can order refund from the shipping line or custodian.

8. Does Section 69 re-export entitlement automatically include demurrage waiver?

No. Section 69 (re-export of imported goods) is independent. Waiver requires a valid detention order under HCCAR, not just re-export proceedings.

9. Who ultimately bears demurrage cost if waiver is granted due to illegal customs detention?

Where detention is due to illegal state action, courts have recognized that CCSPs may seek recovery from Customs authorities.

10. What is the most important takeaway from judicial decisions on waiver disputes?

The entire regime is fault-based:

• No importer fault → waiver generally granted
• Importer fault → waiver can be denied
• No detention order → waiver not applicable at all

References

1. Shipping Corporation of India Ltd. v. C.L. Jain Woollen Mills (AIR 2001 SC 1806) — CaseMine — https://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/56ea8cc1607dba382a0790c1
2. K. International v. Principal Commissioner of Customs, W.P.No.6947 of 2022 (Madras HC, 16.06.2022) — CaseMine — https://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/62ab6915b50db9b9d68ec12b
3. K. International v. Principal Commissioner of Customs — LegitQuest — https://www.legitquest.com/case/ms-gk-international-v-the-principal-commissioner-of-customs-and-ors/78C16D
4. Jethanand Rohra / Jaymco Polymers v. Commissioner of Customs, Customs Appeal No. 86184 of 2021 (CESTAT Mumbai, 09.05.2022) — CaseMine — https://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/6279f243714d5833c85ed1e3
5. Jethanand Rohra v. Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Mumbai) — TaxGuru (2022) — https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/cestat-grants-waiver-detention-demurrage-charges-goods-detained-2-years-fault-appellant.html
6. M/s. Isha Exim v. Commissioner of Customs, W.P.No.26838 of 2018 (Madras HC, 01.07.2021) — CaseMine — https://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/6159ea809fca197b22b03e94
7. Bhavik S. Thakkar v. Union of India, W.P.(C) 982/2015 (Delhi HC, 14.02.2023, 2023/DHC/001046) — CaseMine — https://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/63f0f0f2ded2162298556a83
8. Bhavik S. Thakkar v. Union of India — LegitQuest — https://www.legitquest.com/case/bhavik-s-thakkar-v-union-of-india-ors/7704DF
9. Modern Line-Export v. Deputy Commissioner of Customs, W.P.Nos.727 & 733 of 2024 (Madras HC, 07.06.2024) — LatestLaws — https://www.latestlaws.com/judgements/madras-high-court/2024/june/2024-latest-caselaw-8823-mad/
10. Waiver of demurrage not permissible without a seizure, detention, or confiscation — TaxGuru (2025) — https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/waiver-demurrage-permissible-seizure-detention-confiscation.html
11. M/s. Sai Lakshmi Engineering v. Principal Commissioner, W.P.No.14370 of 2018 (Madras HC, 01.07.2021) — CaseMine — https://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/6159e3f39fca197b22b03e78
12. M/s. R.M. Trading v. Principal Commissioner of Customs, W.P.No.6638 of 2018 (Madras HC, 01.07.2021) — LatestLaws — https://www.latestlaws.com/judgements/madras-high-court/2021/july/2021-latest-caselaw-12834-mad
13. Analysing the Conflict Between Detention Certificates and Right to Demurrage — NLIU CBCL (2023) — https://cbcl.nliu.ac.in/taxation/analysing-the-conflict-between-detention-certificates-and-right-to-demurrage/
14. Indian Perspective on Detention and Demurrage — Singhania Law (2025) — https://singhanialaw.com/indian-perspective-on-detention-and-demurrage-2/

The post The Fault-Based Divide: When Demurrage and Detention Waiver under HCCAR 2009 & SCMTR 2018 Are Granted — and When They Are Refused appeared first on Bhatt & Joshi Associates.

Introduction to Customs Administration in India

Customs administration forms the backbone of India’s international trade framework, and understanding customs procedures is essential for ensuring smooth movement of goods across borders. The Customs Act of 1962 establishes the legal foundation for controlling the movement of goods across India’s borders, whether by sea, air, or land.[1] This legislative framework operates under the constitutional authority granted by Article 265 of the Indian Constitution, which explicitly mandates that no tax shall be levied or collected except by authority of law. Furthermore, Entry 83 of List I to Schedule VII empowers the Union Government to legislate on matters concerning duties of customs, including import and export duties.

The primary objectives of customs regulation extend beyond mere revenue collection. The system serves to protect India’s domestic economy from unfair trade practices, safeguard national security interests, prevent the smuggling of prohibited and restricted goods, and ensure compliance with various international trade agreements to which India is a signatory. The quantum and nature of customs duties are determined through a comprehensive legal framework comprising the Customs Act 1962, the Customs Tariff Act 1975, subordinate rules, notifications issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs, circulars providing procedural guidance, judicial precedents, and annual amendments through Union Finance Acts.

India imposes several categories of customs duties depending on the nature and purpose of imports. Basic Customs Duty represents the standard import duty applied to most goods entering the country. Countervailing Duty serves to neutralize the benefits of subsidies provided by exporting countries to their manufacturers. Additional Customs Duty or Special Countervailing Duty addresses domestic taxes such as excise duties that would otherwise create an uneven playing field. Protective duties shield nascent domestic industries from international competition during their developmental phase. Anti-dumping duties counter the practice of selling goods below their normal value in international markets, thereby protecting domestic producers from predatory pricing strategies.

Constitutional and Legal Framework Governing Customs Administration

The constitutional architecture supporting customs administration in India demonstrates the framers’ intent to centralize control over international trade. The Customs Act extends to the whole of India and governs the entry and exit of vessels, aircraft, goods, and passengers across Indian borders. This centralized approach ensures uniformity in customs procedures across the country, preventing the fragmentation that could arise from state-level variations in import-export regulations.

The relationship between the Customs Act 1962 and the Customs Tariff Act 1975 represents a dual approach to customs regulation. While the Customs Act provides the procedural framework for clearance of goods, assessment of duties, and enforcement mechanisms, the Customs Tariff Act classifies goods and prescribes the rates of duty applicable to different categories of imports and exports. This bifurcation allows for flexibility in tariff adjustments through annual Finance Acts without necessitating amendments to the core procedural provisions of the Customs Act.

Import Procedures: From Arrival to Clearance

Filing of Bill of Entry

The import process commences when goods arrive at an Indian port, airport, or land customs station. Section 46 of the Customs Act mandates that importers file a Bill of Entry for goods intended for home consumption or warehousing.[2] This document serves as the importer’s declaration regarding the nature, quantity, value, and classification of imported goods. The Bill of Entry must be filed in the prescribed form and accompanied by supporting documents including the commercial invoice, packing list, bill of lading or airway bill, insurance documents, import license if applicable, and any certificates required under specific import regulations. Compliance with these customs procedures ensures that imports are legally cleared for entry into the domestic market.

The legislation recognizes that certain goods may not require immediate customs clearance at the port of arrival. Sections 52 through 56 of the Customs Act provide special procedures for goods in transit to destinations outside India, goods intended for transshipment to another customs station within India, and goods that will be transferred to another vessel or aircraft at the same port for onward journey. For such goods, detailed customs procedures are simplified, though procedural compliance remains mandatory. The Import General Manifest or Import Report filed by the carrier must clearly indicate the transit or transshipment status of such goods.

Self-Assessment Regime

Section 17 of the Customs Act introduced a paradigm shift in customs administration by establishing a self-assessment regime.[3] Under this system, importers and exporters bear the responsibility for correctly determining the classification of goods according to the Customs Tariff, declaring the accurate transaction value, calculating the applicable duty, and claiming appropriate exemptions or concessional rates if available. Section 17 of the Customs Act introduced a paradigm shift in customs administration by establishing a self-assessment regime.[3] Under this system, importers and exporters bear the responsibility for correctly determining the classification of goods according to the Customs Tariff, declaring the accurate transaction value, calculating the applicable duty, and claiming appropriate exemptions or concessional rates if available. This approach aligns with international best practices in customs procedures, placing the onus of compliance on the trading community while enabling customs authorities to focus their resources on risk-based verification and enforcement.

The self-assessment regime presumes that importers possess adequate knowledge of customs laws and maintain accurate records of their import transactions. However, the legislation acknowledges situations where an importer may genuinely be unable to determine duty liability with certainty. Section 18 of the Customs Act provides for provisional assessment in such circumstances. When an importer cannot self-assess due to incomplete information regarding the value of goods, uncertainty about the correct tariff classification, or pending test results necessary for classification purposes, a request may be made to the proper officer for provisional assessment. The customs authority may permit provisional clearance upon the importer furnishing security in the form of a bank guarantee or bond to cover the potential difference between provisionally assessed duty and finally determined duty.

Examination of Imported Goods

Verification through physical examination forms an integral component of customs clearance, serving both revenue protection and trade facilitation objectives. The examination process balances the need for thorough verification against the imperative of expeditious clearance. Rather than examining every consignment in its entirety, customs authorities employ risk management systems to identify shipments requiring detailed examination. Factors influencing this selection include the importer’s compliance history, the nature of goods declared, discrepancies in documentation, intelligence regarding potential misdeclarations, and randomized selection protocols.

When first appraisement is warranted, either at the importer’s request or the customs appraiser’s direction, examination occurs before final assessment of duty. The importer must request this facility at the time of filing the Bill of Entry, providing justification for the request. The customs appraiser records the examination order on the Bill of Entry, which is then presented at the import shed where a designated examining officer conducts the physical verification. The shed appraiser or dock examiner opens the packages as necessary, verifies the goods against the declared description, and records detailed findings regarding quantity, quality, and any discrepancies observed.

For consignments not requiring first appraisement, examination occurs after assessment. The assessed Bill of Entry is presented at the import shed where the proper officer of customs conducts verification. Shipments found to conform to the declaration receive clearance orders, enabling the importer to take delivery. Where discrepancies emerge during post-assessment examination, the matter is referred back to the appraising group for reassessment.

Execution of Bonds and Payment of Duty

Certain import schemes and exemption notifications require importers to execute bonds with or without security to ensure compliance with stipulated conditions. These bonds represent undertakings by the importer to fulfill specific obligations such as utilizing imported goods for declared end-use purposes, maintaining proper accounts and records for verification, allowing inspection by customs officers, and paying duty if conditions are violated. The format and conditions of bonds vary depending on the applicable scheme, and execution occurs before the assessing appraiser who verifies the adequacy of security provided.

Payment of assessed customs duty represents a critical step in the clearance process. Importers must deposit the duty amount in designated banks authorized by the respective customs commissionerate. The payment process has been substantially digitized, with electronic payment modes replacing traditional challan-based payments in most locations. Banks endorse payment particulars in the system, enabling real-time verification by customs authorities. This electronic integration minimizes delays associated with manual verification of payment documents.

Amendment Procedures and Prior Entry Facility

The legislation recognizes that genuine errors may occur in Bills of Entry due to clerical mistakes, misunderstanding of complex classifications, or inadvertent omissions. Amendment procedures allow importers to rectify bonafide mistakes after submission of documents. Such amendments require approval from the Deputy Commissioner or Assistant Commissioner of Customs, and the importer must submit a formal request supported by documentary evidence justifying the amendment. The customs authority examines whether the error was genuinely inadvertent and whether the proposed amendment is substantiated by original transaction documents.

Section 46 of the Customs Act facilitates trade by permitting filing of Bills of Entry prior to the arrival of goods, a facility known as prior entry or advance filing. This provision enables importers to initiate clearance procedures while goods are still in transit, thereby reducing dwell time after arrival. A Bill of Entry filed under prior entry remains valid if the carrying vessel or aircraft arrives within thirty days from the date of presentation. Importers must file additional copies including an Advance Noting copy, and must declare that the vessel or aircraft is expected within thirty days. Upon arrival and filing of the Import General Manifest, the importer presents the Bill of Entry for final noting, completing the clearance process expeditiously.

Warehousing Procedures

The warehousing facility under Sections 58 through 73 of the Customs Act allows importers to store goods in customs-bonded warehouses without immediate payment of duty. This facility proves particularly valuable when importers need time to arrange finances for duty payment, wish to store goods pending identification of buyers, or intend to re-export goods without clearing them for home consumption. The Bill of Entry for warehousing follows a format distinct from Bills of Entry for home consumption, though the documentary requirements and assessment procedures remain largely similar.

Payment of assessed customs duty represents a critical step in the clearance process. Importers must deposit the duty amount in designated banks authorized by the respective customs commissionerate. The payment process has been substantially digitized, with electronic payment modes replacing traditional challan-based payments in most locations. Banks endorse payment particulars in the system, enabling real-time verification by customs authorities. This electronic integration reduces errors and ensures that all import transactions comply with established customs procedures.

Export Procedures: From Documentation to Departure

Registration Requirements and Shipping Bill Filing

Export procedures begin with obtaining an Importer-Exporter Code (IEC) from the Directorate General of Foreign Trade, which serves as a unique identifier for each entity engaged in import-export activities. Under the electronic data interchange system implemented across major customs locations, the IEC number is verified online from the DGFT database, ensuring authenticity and compliance with standard customs procedures.

Exporters must also register their authorized foreign exchange dealer code, representing the bank through which export proceeds will be realized. This registration enables the customs system to generate Bank Realization Certificates, which are electronically transmitted to the designated bank for monitoring foreign exchange receipts. Exporters must maintain a current account with the designated bank for credit of drawback incentives and other benefits.

The Shipping Bill constitutes the principal document for export clearance, analogous to the Bill of Entry for imports. Different types of Shipping Bills cater to various export scenarios including free shipping bills for duty-paid goods, drawback shipping bills for claiming duty drawback on inputs used in exported goods, duty-free shipping bills for goods manufactured using duty-free inputs under export promotion schemes, and warehoused shipping bills for goods exported from customs warehouses. Each type of Shipping Bill requires specific supporting documentation relevant to the claimed benefits or concessions.

Documentation and GR Form Requirements

The foreign exchange monitoring mechanism historically relied on GR Forms, which tracked the realization of export proceeds. Exchange Control copies of Shipping Bills were forwarded to the Reserve Bank of India for monitoring purposes. However, recognizing the administrative burden this imposed, the government has granted waivers from GR Form requirements for certain categories of exports. Exports valued at or below twenty-five thousand US dollars are exempt from GR Form requirements, facilitating small-value exports. Similarly, gift exports valued up to five lakh rupees enjoy exemption, acknowledging the non-commercial nature of such transactions. These waivers reduce compliance costs for exporters while maintaining effective monitoring of significant foreign exchange transactions.

Customs Examination and Let Export Order

Upon arrival of export goods at the dock or cargo terminal, port authorities verify the physical receipt of goods against the checklist generated by the electronic system. The exporter or their customs house agent presents the checklist with port endorsement, along with original documents including commercial invoices, packing lists, and any required certificates, to the designated customs officer. This officer verifies the quantity actually received, enters confirmation in the system, and marks the electronic Shipping Bill for examination.

The dock appraiser assigns a customs officer for physical examination if risk parameters or random selection criteria indicate the need for verification. The examination may cover the entire consignment or a representative sample depending on the nature of goods, the exporter’s compliance history, and intelligence inputs. The examining officer prepares a detailed examination report in the electronic system, noting any discrepancies between declared and actual goods. If examination results prove satisfactory and all regulatory requirements are met, the dock appraiser issues the “Let Export” order, authorizing loading of goods onto the export vessel or aircraft.

In certain cases, the dock appraiser may order samples to be drawn for laboratory testing to verify quality standards, compliance with export restrictions, or accurate classification. The customs officer draws samples in duplicate or triplicate as required, prepares test memos signed by customs officials and the exporter, and dispatches samples to designated testing laboratories. Clearance is withheld pending receipt of satisfactory test reports.

Container Stuffing and Loading Supervision

For containerized cargo, stuffing operations at the dock occur under preventive supervision to ensure that goods actually loaded correspond to goods declared in the Shipping Bill and to prevent unauthorized additions or substitutions. Preventive officers verify container seals, supervise the stuffing process, and record container numbers and seal numbers in the system. After completion of stuffing, containers are moved to the vessel loading area under customs supervision.

Loading of both containerized and bulk cargo onto export vessels occurs under preventive supervision. The preventive officer present at the loading berth verifies that loaded goods match the “Let Export” Shipping Bills and provides the “Shipped on Board” endorsement on the exporter’s copy of the Shipping Bill. This endorsement confirms physical export and enables processing of drawback claims and other post-export benefits.

Amendment Procedures for Export Documents

Corrections in export documentation may become necessary due to various reasons including typographical errors in Shipping Bills, changes in shipping arrangements, corrections in quantity or value, or amendments in buyer details. The stage at which correction is sought determines the authority competent to permit the amendment. Before generation of the Shipping Bill number, corrections can be made at the service center without formal approval. After Shipping Bill generation but before the “Let Export” order, the Assistant Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner of Exports may permit amendments upon the exporter’s written request supported by justification and documentary evidence. After issuance of the “Let Export” order, only the Additional Commissioner or Joint Commissioner in charge of exports possesses authority to permit amendments, reflecting the heightened scrutiny applied to post-export modifications.

Drawback Claims and Export General Manifest

Duty drawback represents a refund of customs and central excise duties paid on inputs or raw materials used in the manufacture of exported goods. This mechanism ensures that Indian exports are not disadvantaged in international markets due to embedded duties. Section 75 of the Customs Act provides the legal basis for duty drawback, and detailed rules prescribe the rates and procedures for claiming this benefit.

Under the electronic system, drawback claims are processed automatically without requiring separate claim forms. The Drawback Branch processes claims on a first-come-first-served basis after verification of actual export through the Export General Manifest. Exporters can track claim status through query counters at service centers. If queries or deficiencies are identified, these are communicated electronically, and the claim remains pending until satisfactory responses are received.

Shipping lines and agents must furnish Export General Manifests electronically within seven days from the vessel’s sailing date. The EGM provides Shipping Bill-wise details of exported goods, enabling customs authorities to confirm actual export and release drawback claims. Despite electronic filing, manual EGMs with exporter copies of Shipping Bills continue to be filed as a redundancy measure, ensuring that technical failures in electronic systems do not disrupt the process.

Recent Reforms and Facilitation Measures

Twenty-Four by Seven Customs Clearance

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs introduced round-the-clock customs clearance through Circular 19/2014-Customs dated December 31, 2014, marking a significant departure from traditional working hours.[4] This facility operates at eighteen major seaports and seventeen air cargo complexes, covering specified categories of imports and exports. For imports, facilitated Bills of Entry identified through risk management systems as low-risk shipments qualify for twenty-four by seven clearance. For exports, factory-stuffed containers and goods exported under free Shipping Bills benefit from this facility.

The round-the-clock clearance facility addresses a longstanding concern of the trading community regarding delays caused by restricted customs working hours. Perishable goods, time-sensitive cargo, and just-in-time manufacturing inputs particularly benefit from this reform. The facility reduces dwell time, lowers demurrage and detention charges, and enhances India’s competitiveness in international trade.

Self-Sealing of Export Containers

Traditional Customs procedures required all export containers to be stuffed and sealed under customs supervision, creating bottlenecks at ports and increasing transaction times. Recognizing the maturity of compliance systems and the need for facilitation, the Board introduced simplified procedures for self-sealing of export containers subject to conditions designed to maintain integrity. Authorized exporters with satisfactory compliance records may stuff containers at their factory premises and apply self-seals, which are subsequently verified by customs authorities.

This reform transfers responsibility for container integrity to exporters while enabling customs to focus resources on high-risk consignments. Exporters benefit from flexibility in planning their stuffing operations without depending on customs supervision schedules. The measure exemplifies risk-based facilitation that balances trade efficiency with regulatory oversight.

Electronic Systems and Integration

The comprehensive deployment of electronic data interchange systems across Indian customs locations has transformed clearance processes. The Indian Customs Electronic Data Interchange System enables electronic filing of Bills of Entry and Shipping Bills, electronic payment of duties, electronic processing and assessment, electronic communication of queries and deficiencies, electronic generation of out-of-charge orders, and electronic tracking of consignment status. These technological interventions have substantially reduced interface between importers-exporters and customs officers, minimizing opportunities for corruption and ensuring transparency in decision-making.

Integration with other government systems has further enhanced efficiency. Connectivity with the DGFT system enables real-time verification of IEC codes and import-export licenses. Integration with port operating systems allows seamless exchange of information regarding arrival and departure of vessels and cargo. Connectivity with banking systems facilitates electronic duty payment verification. These integrations create an ecosystem where information flows seamlessly across stakeholders, eliminating redundant data entry and reducing processing time.

Judicial Interpretation and Case Law

The judiciary has played a crucial role in interpreting customs provisions and resolving disputes between revenue and assessees. Courts have established important principles regarding valuation of imported goods, classification disputes, and procedural compliance. The Supreme Court has consistently held that customs classification must be determined according to trade parlance and commercial understanding rather than scientific or technical definitions in isolation. In Commissioner of Customs v. Dilip Kumar and Company, the Court emphasized that classification requires consideration of how goods are known and understood in commercial circles.[5]

Valuation controversies have generated substantial litigation, with courts addressing issues such as acceptability of transaction value, addition of post-importation costs, and valuation of related party transactions. The Supreme Court in CC v. Ferodo India Private Limited held that transaction value should ordinarily be accepted unless customs authorities demonstrate grounds for rejection based on specific evidence rather than mere suspicion.[6] This judgment reinforced the primacy of declared values while preserving revenue’s right to scrutinize transactions with objective evidence of undervaluation.

Regarding Customs Procedures compliance, courts have balanced strict adherence to statutory requirements against recognition of bonafide errors. While fundamental procedural violations cannot be condoned, courts have shown pragmatism in cases of minor irregularities that do not prejudice revenue or violate the statute’s substantive provisions. This approach prevents technical objections from frustrating legitimate trade while maintaining the integrity of customs procedures.

Conclusion

The customs procedures established under the Customs Act 1962 reflect India’s evolution from a protectionist economy to an increasingly open trading nation. The legislative framework balances revenue protection, regulatory compliance, and trade facilitation imperatives. Recent reforms demonstrate the government’s commitment to ease of doing business, with technological interventions and procedural simplifications reducing transaction costs and enhancing competitiveness. The self-assessment regime, twenty-four by seven clearance facilities, electronic integration, and risk-based clearance systems represent significant strides toward modern customs administration aligned with international best practices. As India continues integrating with the global economy, ongoing refinement of customs procedures will remain essential to supporting economic growth while safeguarding national interests.

References

[1] Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue. (n.d.). The Customs Act, 1962. Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs. 

[2] Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs. (2020). Import Procedures and Documentation. https://www.cbic.gov.in/ 

[3] Ministry of Finance. (2016). Self Assessment in Customs. Press Information Bureau, Government of India. https://pib.gov.in/ 

[4] Central Board of Excise and Customs. (2014). Circular No. 19/2014-Customs. Government of India. 

[5] Commissioner of Customs v. Dilip Kumar and Company, (2018) 9 SCC 1. Supreme Court of India. 

[6] Commissioner of Customs v. Ferodo India Private Limited, (2009) 11 SCC 1. Supreme Court of India. 

[7] Directorate General of Foreign Trade. (n.d.). Foreign Trade Policy 2023. Ministry of Commerce and Industry. https://www.dgft.gov.in/ 

[8] Reserve Bank of India. (n.d.). Foreign Exchange Management (Export of Goods and Services) Regulations. https://www.rbi.org.in/ 

[9] Ministry of Law and Justice. (1950). The Constitution of India. Legislative Department. https://legislative.gov.in/constitution-of-india 

Authorized by Prapti Bhatt

The post Customs Act 1962 Procedures: Bill of Entry and Shipping Bill appeared first on Bhatt & Joshi Associates.

Export sales leads represent the foundation of international trade operations, serving as the initial point of contact between sellers and potential buyers in foreign markets. These preliminary business inquiries constitute the first critical step in establishing cross-border commercial relationships and converting market opportunities into actual export transactions. In the context of India’s evolving trade landscape, understanding the legal framework governing export activities and implementing effective lead generation strategies has become essential for businesses seeking to expand their international footprint.

The significance of export sales leads extends beyond mere business development, as they operate within a complex regulatory environment established by multiple legislations. The Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 [1], provides the primary legal framework for regulating India’s international trade, while the Customs Act, 1962 [2], governs the procedural aspects of export clearance and documentation.

Regulatory Framework Governing Export Sales and Business Development

The Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992

The cornerstone of India’s export regulatory framework rests upon the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992, which replaced the earlier Import and Export (Control) Act, 1947. This legislation empowers the Central Government to formulate policies for the development and regulation of foreign trade by facilitating imports and increasing exports. The Act establishes that export and import activities shall be free unless specifically regulated by provisions of the policy or any other law currently in force [1].

The Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT), operating under the Ministry of Commerce and Industry, serves as the nodal agency responsible for implementing and administering the Foreign Trade Policy. This institutional framework ensures that export activities remain aligned with national economic objectives while providing businesses with the necessary regulatory clarity to engage in international trade.

Import Export Code: Mandatory Registration for Export Operations

Before any entity can pursue export sales leads or engage in export activities, obtaining an Importer Exporter Code remains mandatory. The Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992, mandates through its provisions that no export or import shall be made by any person without obtaining an IEC from the regional licensing authority [3]. This ten-digit alphanumeric code serves as a unique business identifier for all international trade transactions.

The IEC registration process requires submission of specific documentation including business registration certificates, bank account details, and identity proof of authorized signatories. This registration requirement ensures traceability of export transactions and facilitates compliance with regulatory obligations. Businesses pursuing export sales leads must maintain active IEC status, as this code is required for all customs clearance procedures and for availing benefits under various export promotion schemes.

Customs Procedures for Export Clearance

The Customs Act, 1962, establishes the procedural framework for export clearance at customs ports and airports. The exporter must make entry of goods for exportation by presenting a shipping bill to the proper officer in case of goods to be exported in a vessel or aircraft, and a bill of export in case of goods to be exported by land [2]. These documents constitute essential export declarations that must accompany all export shipments.

The customs clearance process involves examination and testing of export goods by customs authorities to verify their compliance with export regulations. Export goods shall not be loaded onto vessels until an order has been given by the proper officer granting entry outwards to such goods. This regulatory requirement ensures that all exports comply with applicable laws and that duties, if any, are properly assessed and collected.

Export Sales Lead Generation in Legal Context

Permissible Methods of Business Development

Export sales leads can be generated through various channels including digital marketing, trade show participation, business-to-business networking platforms, and referrals from existing customers. However, all lead generation activities must comply with applicable laws including contract law principles under the Indian Contract Act, 1872, consumer protection regulations, and data privacy requirements.

When pursuing export sales leads, businesses must ensure that their marketing communications and contractual proposals accurately represent the products or services offered. Any misrepresentation or fraudulent inducement in securing export orders can render contracts voidable under contract law principles. The Indian courts have consistently held that contracts must be entered into with free consent of parties competent to contract, for lawful consideration and with lawful object [4].

Contractual Framework for Export Transactions

Once an export sales lead materializes into a potential transaction, the parties enter into contractual negotiations. The formation of export contracts follows general principles of contract law where there must be a clear offer, unqualified acceptance, lawful consideration, and intention to create legal relations. In export transactions involving parties in different jurisdictions, the contract typically specifies the governing law and dispute resolution mechanism.

Indian courts have established that in case of telephonic or electronic communications forming part of contract formation, the contract is considered complete when acceptance is communicated to the offeror. The location where acceptance is received determines the place of contract formation for jurisdictional purposes. This principle applies equally to export contracts formed through modern communication channels.

Export Promotion Schemes and Incentives

Duty Exemption and Remission Schemes

The Government of India operates various export promotion schemes designed to enhance the competitiveness of Indian exports. These schemes provide financial incentives that can be leveraged when pursuing export sales leads. The duty exemption scheme enables duty-free import of inputs for export production, while duty remission schemes provide post-export replenishment of duties on inputs used in export products [5].

Businesses developing export sales leads should factor these incentive schemes into their pricing strategies and commercial proposals. The availability of such benefits can significantly improve the price competitiveness of Indian exports in international markets. However, availment of these schemes requires strict compliance with export obligation requirements and documentation standards prescribed by DGFT.

Export Promotion Capital Goods Scheme

The Export Promotion Capital Goods (EPCG) Scheme allows import of capital goods for pre-production, production and post-production at zero customs duty. Exporters utilizing this scheme commit to fulfilling specific export obligations over a defined period, typically ranging from six to eight years [6]. This scheme enables businesses to enhance their manufacturing capabilities, thereby improving their capacity to service export sales leads effectively.

Exporters must maintain detailed records of capital goods imported, production details, and export transactions to demonstrate compliance with EPCG obligations. The authorities conduct regular scrutiny to verify adherence to scheme conditions. Any violation of export obligations can result in penalties and recovery of duty exemptions availed.

Compliance Requirements for Export Businesses

Documentation and Record Maintenance

Export businesses must maintain meticulous documentation covering all aspects of their trade operations. This includes purchase orders, invoices, shipping bills, bills of lading, insurance documents, and bank realization certificates. The Foreign Trade Policy stipulates that export documents such as shipping bills must indicate the name of both manufacturing exporter or manufacturer and third-party exporters where applicable [7].

The e-Bank Realization Certificate provides evidence of foreign exchange realization from export transactions. Exporters must ensure that export proceeds are realized within the time period specified by the Reserve Bank of India regulations. Failure to realize export proceeds within prescribed timelines can result in regulatory action and impact the exporter’s ability to avail future export benefits.

Anti-Money Laundering and Trade Compliance

Export transactions must comply with anti-money laundering regulations and international trade sanctions. Exporters must conduct due diligence on potential buyers and ensure that their products are not being diverted to restricted destinations or end-users. The Foreign Trade Policy prohibits exports to certain countries and requires end-use certificates for specific categories of goods.

Businesses pursuing export sales leads must implement robust compliance programs that screen potential customers against restricted party lists and verify the legitimacy of transactions. Any violation of export control regulations can result in severe penalties including suspension of export privileges, monetary fines, and criminal prosecution in serious cases.

Strategic Approach to Export Lead Management

Initial Contact and Qualification

Upon receiving an export sales lead, exporters should acknowledge the enquiry within forty-eight hours through email or other electronic means. This prompt response demonstrates professionalism and maintains buyer interest. The acknowledgement should request additional information about the buyer’s requirements, including product specifications, quantity requirements, delivery timelines, and payment terms.

Qualifying export sales leads requires careful assessment of the buyer’s creditworthiness, market reputation, and capacity to fulfill contractual obligations. Exporters should request trade references, financial information, and company background details before committing substantial resources to developing the relationship. This due diligence process protects exporters from potential payment defaults and fraudulent transactions.

Proposal Development and Negotiation

When responding to qualified export sales leads, exporters must prepare detailed commercial proposals that address all aspects of the potential transaction. The proposal should specify product specifications, pricing terms, delivery conditions, payment terms, quality standards, and after-sales support arrangements. Pricing should account for all costs including manufacturing, packaging, transportation, insurance, and applicable duties and taxes.

International commercial terms (Incoterms) should be clearly specified to define the respective responsibilities of buyer and seller for transportation, insurance, and risk transfer. Common Incoterms used in export transactions include FOB (Free on Board), CIF (Cost, Insurance and Freight), and CFR (Cost and Freight). The choice of Incoterms significantly impacts the total transaction cost and risk allocation between parties.

Follow-up and Relationship Management

Consistent follow-up remains crucial for converting export sales leads into actual orders. Exporters should maintain regular communication with potential buyers without exerting undue pressure. Follow-up communications should provide additional product information, address buyer queries, and offer solutions to any concerns raised during negotiations.

Building long-term relationships with export buyers requires demonstrating reliability in product quality, delivery timelines, and after-sales support. Successful exporters invest in understanding their buyers’ evolving requirements and adapting their offerings accordingly. This customer-centric approach transforms one-time transactions into sustainable business relationships.

Legal Considerations in Export Contract Performance

Quality Standards and Product Liability

Export contracts typically specify quality standards and inspection procedures that products must meet. Exporters bear responsibility for ensuring that delivered goods conform to agreed specifications and quality parameters. Any breach of quality commitments can trigger contractual remedies including price adjustments, replacement of defective goods, or contract termination.

Product liability laws in the destination country may impose additional obligations on exporters. Exporters should obtain appropriate insurance coverage to protect against product liability claims. The contract should clearly define the warranty period, covered defects, and remedial procedures to minimize disputes.

Payment Terms and Foreign Exchange Regulations

Export payment terms must comply with Reserve Bank of India regulations governing foreign exchange transactions. Common payment methods include letters of credit, documentary collections, advance payment, and open account terms. The choice of payment method affects the exporter’s cash flow and credit risk exposure.

Letters of credit provide the highest level of payment security as they involve a bank commitment to pay upon presentation of compliant documents. However, exporters must ensure strict compliance with letter of credit terms to avoid discrepancies that could delay payment. The Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, regulates foreign exchange transactions and requires realization of export proceeds within specified timeframes [8].

Dispute Resolution Mechanisms

Export contracts should include clear dispute resolution clauses specifying the mechanism for resolving disagreements. Options include litigation in specified courts, arbitration under institutional rules, or mediation. International commercial arbitration provides a neutral forum for resolving cross-border disputes and arbitral awards are generally enforceable under the New York Convention on Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards.

Indian courts have upheld the principle that contractual clauses specifying foreign jurisdiction or arbitration are valid and enforceable unless they impose absolute restraints on legal proceedings. Parties can mutually agree to resolve disputes through arbitration conducted in a neutral jurisdiction. However, any such agreement must comply with fundamental principles of contract law including free consent and lawful object.

Case Law Perspectives on Export Contracts

Indian jurisprudence has developed principles governing various aspects of export transactions through judicial interpretation. Courts have emphasized that export contracts must be read according to their express terms, and implied terms should only be incorporated when strictly necessary to give business efficacy to the agreement. This approach respects the commercial judgment of parties while ensuring fairness in contractual relationships.

In matters concerning export subsidies and incentive schemes, the World Trade Organization dispute resolution mechanism has examined India’s export promotion measures. Certain export incentive programs were found to constitute prohibited export subsidies under the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures, leading to modifications in India’s export promotion framework [9]. These developments underscore the importance of ensuring that export incentive utilization complies with India’s international trade obligations.

Contemporary Developments in Export Trade

Digital Transformation of Export Processes

The digitalization of export procedures through platforms like ICEGATE (Indian Customs Electronic Commerce/Electronic Data Interchange Gateway) has streamlined documentation and clearance processes. Exporters can electronically file shipping bills, track clearance status, and obtain necessary approvals without physical visits to customs offices. This technological advancement reduces transaction costs and improves the speed of export clearance.

The Foreign Trade Policy 2023 emphasizes automation in approvals and collaboration with multiple authorities to create a facilitative environment for exporters. The policy aims to position India as a global leader in exports by simplifying procedures and providing comprehensive support to exporters, including small and medium enterprises.

Emerging Market Opportunities

India has actively pursued Free Trade Agreements with various countries and regional blocs to expand market access for Indian exports. Recent agreements with the European Free Trade Association and ongoing negotiations with other trading partners create new opportunities for exporters pursuing international sales leads. These agreements provide preferential tariff treatment and simplified customs procedures for qualifying exports.

Exporters should familiarize themselves with Rules of Origin requirements under various FTAs to determine eligibility for preferential treatment. Proper certification of origin and compliance with content requirements remain essential for availing FTA benefits. The Indian Trade Portal provides information on applicable tariff rates, rules of origin, and technical standards under different trade agreements.

Conclusion

Export sales leads represent critical opportunities for businesses seeking to expand their international presence and contribute to India’s export growth objectives. Success in converting these leads into sustainable export relationships requires understanding the comprehensive legal framework governing export activities, implementing robust compliance systems, and adopting customer-focused business development strategies.

The regulatory environment established by the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992, and the Customs Act, 1962, provides the necessary structure for legitimate export trade while preventing illegal activities. Exporters must navigate this framework while leveraging available export promotion schemes to enhance their competitiveness in global markets.

As India pursues its ambitious export targets, businesses that combine legal compliance, operational excellence, and strategic relationship management will be best positioned to capitalize on export opportunities. The integration of technology in trade processes and expansion of market access through trade agreements create favorable conditions for export growth, making this an opportune time for businesses to develop their export capabilities and pursue international sales leads with confidence and professionalism.

References

[1] Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India. (1992). Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992. Available at: https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/1947/3/A1992-22.pdf 

[2] Ministry of Finance, Government of India. (1962). The Customs Act, 1962. Available at: https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/2475 

[3] Directorate General of Foreign Trade. (2023). Foreign Trade Policy 2023. Available at: https://www.dgft.gov.in/CP/?opt=ft-policy 

[4] Government of India. (1872). The Indian Contract Act, 1872. Available at: https://www.indiacode.nic.in 

[5] Directorate General of Foreign Trade. Export Promotion Schemes. Available at: https://content.dgft.gov.in/Website/EPS.pdf 

[6] Directorate General of Foreign Trade. Export Promotion Capital Goods (EPCG) Scheme. Available at: https://www.dgft.gov.in/CP/?opt=epcg 

[7] Directorate General of Foreign Trade. (2023). General Provisions Regarding Imports and Exports – Chapter 2, Foreign Trade Policy 2023. Available at: https://content.dgft.gov.in/Website/dgftprod/4f665d2f-20cc-4887-ae6a-5ec912bc0d44/FTP2023_Chapter02.pdf 

[8] Reserve Bank of India. (1999). Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999. Available at: https://www.rbi.org.in 

[9] World Trade Organization. India — Export Related Measures (DS541). Available at: https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds541_e.htm 

The post Chapter 9 Export Sales Leads appeared first on Bhatt & Joshi Associates.