A GST show cause notice is the stage at which a GST dispute becomes formal. Earlier steps, such as a scrutiny query, departmental audit or intimation of discrepancy, are generally preliminary. Once the GST notice is issued, the proposed tax demand enters the adjudication process, and the reply becomes an important part of the record for the adjudication order, first appeal and subsequent appeal to the GST Appellate Tribunal. A late, generic or unsupported reply to a GST show cause notice can seriously weaken the taxpayer’s case and may be difficult to correct at a later stage.

Know which provision you are under

This is the first question, and since 2024 it has a new answer.

For periods up to FY 2023-24, demands are raised under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 where fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts is not alleged, and under Section 74 where it is. The distinction matters enormously, because it governs both the limitation period and the penalty exposure.

For FY 2024-25 onwards, a single provision applies. Section 74A, inserted by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2024, replaces Sections 73 and 74 for demands from that year, unifying the limitation period regardless of whether fraud is alleged, while retaining separate penalty consequences for fraud and non-fraud cases. The relevant provisions were brought into force with effect from 1 November 2024 by Notification No. 17/2024-Central Tax.

Checking that the correct provision has been invoked is a substantive exercise, not a formality. Where a notice for FY 2024-25 invokes Section 73 or 74 instead of Section 74A, High Courts have treated the error as indicating non-application of mind or a jurisdictional infirmity.

GST Time Limits

Section 74A also introduces a de minimis rule: no notice is to be issued where the amount involved is below the threshold the section prescribes.

A notice issued beyond the applicable period is open to challenge on limitation alone, and that objection should be taken in the reply rather than saved for appeal.

The GST notice forms

The process runs through prescribed forms under Rule 142 of the CGST Rules, 2017.

DRC-01A is the intimation of tax ascertained as payable, issued before the formal notice. It offers an opportunity to pay or to explain, and a considered response at this stage sometimes avoids a notice altogether.

DRC-01 is the summary of the show cause notice, uploaded on the portal alongside the notice itself.

DRC-06 is the form in which the reply is filed.

DRC-07 is the summary of the order.

Notices and orders appear on the GST portal under the additional notices and orders view. A recurring and avoidable failure is simply not seeing the notice, because the portal was not monitored and the registered email was not in use.

Paying before, or soon after, the notice

The Act builds in incentives to close matters early, and they are among the most valuable options available.

Under Section 73, a person may pay the tax with interest before the notice is issued, on the basis of their own ascertainment or that of the officer, and inform the officer — in which case no notice is issued in respect of that amount. Where payment with interest is made within thirty days of the notice, no penalty is payable and the proceedings are deemed concluded.

Under Section 74, the corresponding options carry penalty at the reduced rates the section prescribes — a lower rate for payment before the notice, a higher one for payment within thirty days of the notice, and a further rate for payment within thirty days of the order.

Under Section 74A, the cure period for settling a demand with reduced penalty is longer than the thirty days available under the earlier provisions.

These are commercial decisions, not merely legal ones, and they are worth evaluating at the outset — particularly where the demand is small relative to the cost and duration of contesting it.

Drafting the reply to a GST show cause notice

Address each allegation separately. Notices commonly bundle several issues — a mismatch between returns, an input tax credit disallowance, a classification question, a place-of-supply dispute. Each requires its own answer.

Reconcile with documents. The core of most replies is a reconciliation supported by invoices, ledgers, e-way bills, contracts, bank statements and the returns themselves. Assertions without documents rarely succeed.

Take the jurisdictional and limitation points expressly. Whether the notice is within time; whether the correct provision has been invoked; whether the officer had jurisdiction; whether the notice discloses the grounds relied upon.

Attack an unsupported fraud allegation directly. Where Section 74 has been invoked, the allegation of fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression must be specifically stated and supported by material. Section 75(2) provides that where the appellate authority or court concludes that the notice under Section 74 is not sustainable because fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression has not been established, the officer is to determine the tax as if the notice had been issued under Section 73 — with the lower penalty that follows.

Always request a personal hearing. Section 75(4) requires an opportunity of hearing to be granted where a request is received in writing, or where any adverse decision is contemplated. Section 75(5) permits adjournments on sufficient cause, subject to the maximum number the section allows.

File within the time specified in the notice. Where more time is genuinely needed, seek an extension in writing before the period expires rather than after.

Two structural safeguards

Section 75(7) provides that the amount of tax, interest and penalty demanded in the order shall not exceed the amount specified in the notice, and no demand shall be confirmed on grounds other than those specified in the notice. An order that travels beyond the notice is therefore vulnerable.

And an order passed without considering the reply, or without the hearing that Section 75(4) requires, is open to challenge on natural justice grounds — a ground that succeeds regularly.

After the order

The remedy against a GST adjudication order is a first appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act, subject to the prescribed limitation period and pre-deposit requirements. The quality of the reply to a GST show cause notice can significantly affect the appeal because the appellate authority examines the record created during the adjudication proceedings, including the taxpayer’s reply and supporting documents.

FAQ

What is a GST show cause notice?

A GST show cause notice formally starts the demand proceedings and requires the taxpayer to explain why tax, interest or penalty should not be recovered.

Which section applies to a GST demand?

Sections 73 and 74 generally apply to periods up to FY 2023-24, while Section 74A applies to FY 2024-25 onwards.

Can a GST notice be challenged on limitation?

Yes. If the notice is issued beyond the applicable statutory time limit, limitation should be specifically raised in the reply.

Which form is used to reply to a GST notice?

The reply to a show cause notice is generally filed in FORM GST DRC-06 through the GST portal.

Can I request a personal hearing?

Yes. A taxpayer should expressly request a personal hearing, particularly where an adverse decision is contemplated.

Can the adjudication order exceed the demand in the notice?

No. Under Section 75(7), the order cannot confirm tax, interest or penalty exceeding the amount specified in the notice or rely on grounds not stated in the notice.

Legal Information Disclaimer

This article is published for general legal information and educational purposes only. It reflects the position of Indian law as researched up to 10 August 2026 and may not account for subsequent amendments, notifications, circulars or judicial developments. GST timelines have also been extended by notification for particular years, so the position for a specific financial year should be checked. It is not legal advice, does not take into account any individual’s particular facts or circumstances, and no advocate-client relationship arises from reading it. Readers dealing with an actual matter should obtain independent professional advice from a qualified advocate or tax professional of their own choosing before acting on any information contained here. Statutory provisions, notified figures, rules and case citations referred to in this article have been compiled from published legal materials and may contain errors or omissions, and may have changed since the date stated; no representation or warranty, express or implied, is given as to their accuracy, completeness or currency, and each should be independently verified against the official text or the official record before being relied upon. No liability is accepted for any loss arising from reliance on this article.

Sources / Authorities

• Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 — Sections 73, 74, 74A, 75 (including sub-sections (2), (4), (5) and (7)) and 107 — India Code, https://www.indiacode.nic.in
• Finance (No. 2) Act, 2024 — insertion of Section 74A and restriction of Sections 73 and 74 to periods up to FY 2023-24
• Notification No. 17/2024-Central Tax — appointing 1 November 2024 as the date on which the relevant provisions come into force
• Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 — Rule 142 and Forms DRC-01A, DRC-01, DRC-06 and DRC-07
• 53rd meeting of the GST Council, 22 June 2024 — recommendations underlying the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2024 amendments

The post How to reply to a GST show cause notice (with time limits) appeared first on Bhatt & Joshi Associates.