When Customs officers seize a consignment, the loss can start immediately. Demurrage and detention charges keep adding up, contracts may be delayed, and perishable or seasonal goods can lose value. The Customs Act, 1962 provides ways to seek release of seized goods, including the six-month rule under Section 110(2) and provisional release under Section 110A. Knowing which option applies can help secure the goods faster.

What Is a Customs Seizure?

Section 110(1) empowers the proper officer, having reason to believe that goods are liable to confiscation under the Act, to seize them. Where seizure is not practicable, the proviso permits an order prohibiting the owner from removing, parting with or otherwise dealing with the goods without prior permission.

“Reason to believe” is a real threshold. It is not the same as suspicion; it requires knowledge of facts that would lead a reasonable person to that conclusion, and where the Act requires it to be recorded, it must be recorded in writing and in good faith.

Two practical points follow. The reasons should be set out in a seizure memo or order. And a panchnama — which is a record made by witnesses — is not itself an order of seizure; the Delhi High Court has held that a panchnama cannot be treated as an order under Section 110.

Section 110(3) separately empowers seizure of documents and things useful or relevant to proceedings.

Routes for Release of Goods Seized by Customs

Route 1: the six-month rule under Section 110(2)

This is the strongest protection available, and it operates automatically.

Section 110(2) provides that where goods are seized under sub-section (1) and no notice is given under clause (a) of Section 124 within six months of the seizure, the goods shall be returned to the person from whose possession they were seized.

The first proviso permits the Principal Commissioner of Customs or the Commissioner of Customs, for reasons to be recorded in writing, to extend that period by a further period not exceeding six months — and requires that the person from whom the goods were seized be informed before the expiry of the period so specified.

Both conditions matter. An extension granted without recorded reasons, or without informing the person before expiry, is open to challenge, and the consequence of a successful challenge is that the goods must be returned.

The second proviso, inserted by the Finance Act, 2018, is equally important and frequently overlooked: where an order for provisional release has been passed under Section 110A, the six-month period does not apply.

That has a real strategic consequence. Taking provisional release removes the automatic six-month protection. Where a seizure looks weak and the department appears unlikely to issue a notice in time, waiting may secure unconditional return; where the goods are perishable or the commercial cost of waiting is high, provisional release is the better course. The choice should be made consciously rather than by default.

Note also what the six-month rule does not do. It governs the seizure, not the validity of a notice. Section 124 itself prescribes no period for the notice, and the expiry of the Section 110(2) period entitles the person to return of the goods without extinguishing the department’s power to proceed for confiscation and penalty.

Route 2: provisional release under Section 110A

Section 110A provides that goods, documents or things seized under Section 110 may, pending the order of the adjudicating authority, be released to the owner on taking a bond in the proper form, with such security and conditions as the adjudicating authority may require.

The application. A written application is made to the adjudicating authority, setting out the facts, the commercial urgency, the nature of the goods, the duty already paid, and the terms offered by way of bond and security.

The terms. These typically involve a bond for the value of the goods, together with a bank guarantee or security covering the duty and a proportion of the likely penalty and redemption fine. The quantum is a matter for the authority, but it must be reasonable: an order imposing conditions so onerous that release becomes illusory is open to challenge, and High Courts have repeatedly moderated excessive conditions.

What release does not do. Provisional release does not decide the dispute. Adjudication continues, and the bond and security remain at risk until it concludes. Nor does it convert seized goods into cleared goods for other regulatory purposes.

Goods that cannot be released. Where goods are prohibited, or their import is otherwise not permitted, provisional release may be refused. The distinction between goods that are prohibited and goods that are merely mis-declared or undervalued is therefore central to the application.

Route 3: a writ petition

The High Court’s jurisdiction under Article 226 is available where the statutory route has failed or does not answer the grievance — for example where no seizure memo recording reasons was ever issued; where the six-month period has expired without a notice and the goods are still not returned; where an extension was granted without reasons or without informing the person; where an application for provisional release has simply not been decided; or where the conditions imposed are so unreasonable as to defeat the remedy.

These petitions are commonly filed and frequently succeed, precisely because the questions are narrow and documentary.

Practical Guidance

Get the paperwork immediately. Ask in writing for the seizure memo, the recorded reasons and the panchnama. Much of what follows depends on what those documents do or do not say.

Diarise the six months from the date of seizure, and watch for an extension order — its date, its reasons, and whether it was communicated before expiry.

Decide consciously between waiting and applying. The second proviso to Section 110(2) means the two routes are not cumulative in effect.

Document the commercial loss. Demurrage and detention accrue from day one, and evidence of the cost strengthens both an application for provisional release and a writ petition on delay.

Keep the adjudication in view. Release of the goods is an interim outcome. The show cause notice under Section 124, the reply to it, and the adjudication that follows decide whether the goods are confiscated and whether penalty is imposed.

FAQs

1. What happens when Customs seizes goods?
Customs may seize goods under Section 110 when there is reason to believe they are liable for confiscation.

2. What is the six-month rule under Section 110(2)?
If no notice under Section 124 is issued within six months, the seized goods generally must be returned, subject to a valid extension.

3. Can seized goods be released before adjudication?
Yes. Section 110A allows provisional release against a bond, security and conditions imposed by the authority.

4. Does provisional release end the Customs case?
No. The adjudication process continues even after the goods are provisionally released.

5. Can I approach the High Court for release of seized goods?
Yes, particularly where Customs fails to follow statutory requirements or imposes unreasonable conditions.

6. Does Section 110(2) apply after provisional release?
No. The second proviso to Section 110(2) excludes cases where provisional release under Section 110A has been ordered.

Legal Information Disclaimer

This article is published for general legal information and educational purposes only. It reflects the position of Indian law as researched up to 10 August 2026 and may not account for subsequent amendments, notifications, circulars or judicial developments. It is not legal advice, does not take into account any individual’s particular facts or circumstances, and no advocate-client relationship arises from reading it. Readers dealing with an actual matter should obtain independent professional advice from a qualified advocate of their own choosing before acting on any information contained here. Statutory provisions, notified figures, rules and case citations referred to in this article have been compiled from published legal materials and may contain errors or omissions, and may have changed since the date stated; no representation or warranty, express or implied, is given as to their accuracy, completeness or currency, and each should be independently verified against the official text or the official record before being relied upon. No liability is accepted for any loss arising from reliance on this article.

Sources / Authorities

• Customs Act, 1962 — Sections 110 (including sub-sections (1), (2) and (3) and the provisos to sub-section (2)), 110A and 124 — India Code, https://www.indiacode.nic.in
• Finance Act, 2018 (Act No. 13 of 2018) — substitution of the provisos to Section 110(2), including the provision that the six-month period does not apply where provisional release has been ordered under Section 110A
• Principal Commissioner of Customs (Import), ICD v. Santhosh Handloom, 2016 (337) E.L.T. 44 (Delhi High Court) — Section 110 as the source of the power of seizure and vacation of seizure on non-issuance of notice — reference as reported; verify against the official record
• Constitution of India, Article 226

The post How to Get Goods Released After a Customs Seizure appeared first on Bhatt & Joshi Associates.