Komal Ahuja Banking/Finance Law, Delhi High Court, Government Regulations, GST Law, Taxation anti-profiteering mechanism, business implications, CGST Act, compliance, constitutional validity, consumer benefits, Delhi High Court, equity., fairness, Goods and Services Tax, GST, Integrity, Judiciary, Legislative Intent, ruling, Section 171, Taxation, Verdict
Komal Ahuja Uncategorized balance, biases, credibility, Criminal Trial, defense, evidentiary integrity, fairness, impartiality, inconsistencies, investigative procedures, investigative standards, Judicial Scrutiny, JUSTICE, legal context, legal precedent, Legal Principles, Periyasamy v. State, Prosecution, Rule of Law, scrutiny, Supreme Court, Verdict, witness testimony
Komal Ahuja Uncategorized compliance, District Collectors, Enforcement Mechanism, Governance, High Courts, Illegal Religious Structures, judgement, Judicial Oversight, Legal Framework, Nationwide Implementation, Public Land, Public Spaces, Rule of Law, Supreme Court, Unauthorized Constructions, Verdict
Komal Ahuja Uncategorized Aam Aadmi Party, AAP, Anil Masih, Article 142, Background, Ballot Tampering, Bharatiya Janata Party, BJP, Chandigarh Mayoral Election, Chief Justice of India, constitution, criminal prosecution, Democratic Principles, Dr D.Y. Chandrachud, Electoral Misconduct, Integrity of Elections., Interim Relief, Invalidation of Ballots, Kuldeep Kumar, Legal Scrutiny, Manoj Sonkar, Mockery of Democracy, Nullification of Election, Perjury, Punjab and Haryana High Court, Show Cause Notice, Supreme Court, Three-judge Bench, Verdict, Video Evidence
