Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996

Delhi High Court Reaffirms Limited Scope of Section 11 Proceedings: Arbitrator Must Decide Applicability of Arbitration Clause

bhattandjoshiassociates Arbitration Law Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, Arbitration Clause, Arbitration Law, Commercial Disputes, Delhi High Court, Indraprastha Gas Limited v. M/s Chintamani Food and Snacks, Judicial Intervention, Kompetenz-Kompetenz, Scope of Section 11 Proceedings, Section 11 Proceedings

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Discretion to Change Venue in Arbitration Proceedings

Komal Ahuja Arbitration Lawyers, Bombay High Court, Judicial Decisions Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, Arbitration Proceedings, Arbitrator’s Discretion, Bombay High Court Arbitration, Dhule Municipal Commissioner v. Borse Brothers Engineers and Contractors Pvt. Ltd., Section 20 Arbitration, Venue of Arbitration

Arbitration Timing Guidelines: Insights from Delhi High Court’s Interpretation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Komal Ahuja Arbitration Lawyers, Delhi High Court Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, Arbitration Timing Guidelines, Delhi High Court, Judicial Scrutiny, Legal Ruling, Litigation Process, Procedural Compliance

Jurisdictional Aspects of Interim Measures in Arbitration

Komal Ahuja Uncategorized Arbitration, Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, Interim Measures, Pecuniary, Section 17, section 9, Section 9 application., Territorial Jurisdiction

Part I: Arbitration in India

Komal Ahuja Uncategorized Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, Arbitration in India, Indian Arbitration Act of 1899

“Liberty” : How the Delhi High Court asserted its jurisdiction over the arbitration between Liberty Footwear Company and Liberty Shoes Ltd

Komal Ahuja Uncategorized Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, Delhi High Court, Liberty Footwear Company