Ministry Of Environment & Forest & Ors.
Komal Ahuja Uncategorized bauxite mining, community consultations, development policies, Dongria Kondh tribe, economic development, environmental degradation, environmental governance, environmental impact assessments, forest clearance, Forest Conservation Act, Forest Rights Act, Gram Sabhas, inclusive development practices, indigenous rights, Landmark Judgment, Legal Framework, Legal Landscape, Ministry Of Environment & Forest & Ors., Niyamgiri Hills, Orissa Mining Corporation Ltd, Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act (PESA), participatory governance, protecting indigenous lands, social injustice, Supreme Court, Sustainable Development
Komal Ahuja Uncategorized 21st century, balanced future, bauxite mining, conservation efforts, Constitutional Mandate, development interests, economic significance, environmental jurisprudence, environmental law, environmental standards, FCA, forest clearance, Forest Conservation Act, Forest Rights Act, FRA, inclusivity, indigenous rights, irreversible environmental impact, Legal analysis, legal arguments, legal decisions, legal frameworks, Legal Precedents, Ministry Of Environment & Forest & Ors., MOEF, Niyamgiri Hills, Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, PESA, petitioner, respondent, responsible development, rissa Mining Corporation Ltd, Supreme Court, Sustainable Development, tribal rights
Komal Ahuja Uncategorized 1996, collaborative path, community rights, cultural heritage, decentralized governance, decision-making powers, environmental conservation, environmental governance, equitable future., Gram Sabhas, grassroots participation, inclusive development, indigenous communities, land acquisition, local self-governance, Ministry Of Environment & Forest & Ors., minor forest produce, natural resources, Orissa Mining Corporation Ltd, Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, participatory governance, PESA, resettlement projects, Scheduled Areas, Supreme Court judgment, Sustainable Development, sustainable resource management, transformative potential, tribal rights
Komal Ahuja Uncategorized 1980, 21st century challenges, biodiversity, collaborative effort, conservation principles, development projects, ecological integrity, economic development, economic imperatives, ecosystem, environmental conservation, environmental impact assessments, environmental safeguards, FCA, Forest Conservation Act, Forested regions, indigenous communities, legal instrument, Legal Landscape, legal precedent, Legal Scrutiny, Ministry Of Environment & Forest & Ors., natural heritage, Niyamgiri Hills, Orissa Mining Corporation Ltd, resilient society., responsible development, societal needs, Supreme Court judgment, Sustainable Development
Komal Ahuja Uncategorized 2006, biodiversity, cultural heritage, custodians, democratic decision-making, developmental projects, ecological balance, ecological sustainability, environmental conservation, environmental jurisprudence, equity., Forest Rights Act, FRA, Gram Sabha authority, Gram Sabhas, historical injustices, inclusive development, indigenous communities, indigenous knowledge, legal recognition, local governance, Ministry Of Environment & Forest & Ors., Orissa Mining Corporation Ltd, social identity, social justice, Supreme Court judgment, sustainable forest management, traditional rights, traditions, tribal rights
Komal Ahuja Uncategorized bauxite mining, conservation principles, constitutional validity, Dongria Kondh, ecological integrity, environmental conservation, environmental ethics, environmental governance, FCA, Forest Conservation Act, Forest Rights Act, FRA, indigenous communities, industrial development, Landmark Judgment, Legal Framework, Legal Implications, Legal Precedents, Ministry Of Environment & Forest & Ors., Niyamgiri Hills, Odisha, Orissa Mining Corporation Ltd, Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, PESA, Supreme Court, traditional way of life, tribal rights
