![supreme-court-rules-subsequent-change-in-law-not-a-ground-for-condonation-of-delay Supreme Court Rules Subsequent Change in Law Not a Ground for Condonation of Delay](https://bhattandjoshiassociates.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/supreme-court-rules-subsequent-change-in-law-not-a-ground-for-condonation-of-delay-1030x539-1200x628.png)
Section24
![supreme-court-rules-subsequent-change-in-law-not-a-ground-for-condonation-of-delay Supreme Court Rules Subsequent Change in Law Not a Ground for Condonation of Delay](https://bhattandjoshiassociates.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/supreme-court-rules-subsequent-change-in-law-not-a-ground-for-condonation-of-delay-1030x539-1200x628.png)
Komal Ahuja Judicial Decisions, Legal News, News Update, Supreme Court Condonation of Delay, filing appeals, Justice Dipankar Datta, Justice Surya Kant, Justice Ujjal Bhuyan, Land Acquisitio, Legal Finality, legal precedent, Public Interest, Section24, Subsequent change in law, Supreme Court