
Komal Ahuja Uncategorized Adish Aggarwala, AIBA, All India Bar Association, Chief Justice of India, CJI, Confidentiality, Constitution Bench, Corporate Donors, Digitization, Disclosure, ECI, Election Commission of India, Electoral Bonds Scheme, Electoral Bonds Verdict, implementation., judgment, Legal Proceedings, President Droupadi Murmu, Presidential Reference, Registrar General, Scanning, SCBA President, Sealed Envelopes, State Bank of India, Suo Motu Review, Unconstitutional
Komal Ahuja Uncategorized accused, Background, Case Analysis, cheque dishonor cases., complainant's prima facie case, complainants, Context, courts, decision-making, discretion, discretionary, fairness, financial distress, Integrity, interim compensation, Interpretation, Judicial Scrutiny, JUSTICE, Legal Proceedings, legal system, mandatory, Negotiable Instruments Act, observation, parameters, presumption, principles, procedural flaws, purpose, relationship, ruling, Section 143A, significance, Supreme Court
Komal Ahuja Uncategorized Accountability, Accountability Measures, Bharatiya Janata Party, BJP, Corporate Donors, democratic governance, democratic process, donations, ECI, Election Commission of India, Electoral Bonds, electoral ecosystem, fairness, India, individual donors, Integrity, Judicial Intervention, Political Funding, political parties, public perception, reform, regulatory oversight, regulatory reforms, Supreme Court, Transparency, transparency measures
Komal Ahuja Uncategorized assessing officer authority, documentation, financial dealings, Income tax assessment, investor identity, Khyathi Steel Industries (P.) Ltd., legal precedent, long-term capital gain, material facts disclosure, Principal Commissioner of Income-tax, Rajshree Realtors (P.) Ltd., satisfactory explanation, section 68, Section 68 additions, share application money, shell companies, substantiation, Swetaben Ghanshyambhai Patel, tax imposition, taxation law, transaction genuineness, Transparency, undisclosed income, Union of India, unjust tax additions
Komal Ahuja Uncategorized account payee cheques, Accountability, Black Money, cash credits, Cash transactions, compliance, deposits, electronic clearing system, financial dealings, financial transparency, Income Tax Act, Indian financial system, Legal analysis, legal experts., loans, Penalties, penalties for 269SS violations, penalties for 269T violations, repayment, Section 269SS, Section 269ST, section 269T, Section 271D, Section 271DA, Section 271E, section 68, specified sums, tax professionals, traceability, Transparency
Komal Ahuja Uncategorized Black Money, Cash transactions, documentation, Financial ecosystem, Income Tax Act, Judicial precedents, Legal Framework, Penalties, Practical compliance, Professional advice., Section 269ST, section 269T, section 68, Sections 269SS, Tax compliance, Transparency
Komal Ahuja Uncategorized biodiversity conservation, CBD, community consultations, community governance, Convention on Biological Diversity, economic development, environmental impact assessments, environmental jurisprudence, environmental responsibility, Forest Conservation Act, Forest Rights Act, global practices, Gram Sabha consent, inclusive development, India, indigenous rights, international environmental standards, judgment, legal frameworks, legal history, Ministry Of Environment & Forest, Orissa Mining Corporation Ltd, principles, Sustainable Development, sustainable future, traditional knowledge, UNDRIP, United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples
Komal Ahuja Uncategorized bauxite mining, community consultations, development policies, Dongria Kondh tribe, economic development, environmental degradation, environmental governance, environmental impact assessments, forest clearance, Forest Conservation Act, Forest Rights Act, Gram Sabhas, inclusive development practices, indigenous rights, Landmark Judgment, Legal Framework, Legal Landscape, Ministry Of Environment & Forest & Ors., Niyamgiri Hills, Orissa Mining Corporation Ltd, Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act (PESA), participatory governance, protecting indigenous lands, social injustice, Supreme Court, Sustainable Development
Komal Ahuja Uncategorized 21st century, balanced future, bauxite mining, conservation efforts, Constitutional Mandate, development interests, economic significance, environmental jurisprudence, environmental law, environmental standards, FCA, forest clearance, Forest Conservation Act, Forest Rights Act, FRA, inclusivity, indigenous rights, irreversible environmental impact, Legal analysis, legal arguments, legal decisions, legal frameworks, Legal Precedents, Ministry Of Environment & Forest & Ors., MOEF, Niyamgiri Hills, Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, PESA, petitioner, respondent, responsible development, rissa Mining Corporation Ltd, Supreme Court, Sustainable Development, tribal rights
Komal Ahuja Uncategorized 1996, collaborative path, community rights, cultural heritage, decentralized governance, decision-making powers, environmental conservation, environmental governance, equitable future., Gram Sabhas, grassroots participation, inclusive development, indigenous communities, land acquisition, local self-governance, Ministry Of Environment & Forest & Ors., minor forest produce, natural resources, Orissa Mining Corporation Ltd, Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, participatory governance, PESA, resettlement projects, Scheduled Areas, Supreme Court judgment, Sustainable Development, sustainable resource management, transformative potential, tribal rights