Komal Ahuja Uncategorized bauxite mining, community consultations, development policies, Dongria Kondh tribe, economic development, environmental degradation, environmental governance, environmental impact assessments, forest clearance, Forest Conservation Act, Forest Rights Act, Gram Sabhas, inclusive development practices, indigenous rights, Landmark Judgment, Legal Framework, Legal Landscape, Ministry Of Environment & Forest & Ors., Niyamgiri Hills, Orissa Mining Corporation Ltd, Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act (PESA), participatory governance, protecting indigenous lands, social injustice, Supreme Court, Sustainable Development
Komal Ahuja Uncategorized 21st century, balanced future, bauxite mining, conservation efforts, Constitutional Mandate, development interests, economic significance, environmental jurisprudence, environmental law, environmental standards, FCA, forest clearance, Forest Conservation Act, Forest Rights Act, FRA, inclusivity, indigenous rights, irreversible environmental impact, Legal analysis, legal arguments, legal decisions, legal frameworks, Legal Precedents, Ministry Of Environment & Forest & Ors., MOEF, Niyamgiri Hills, Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, PESA, petitioner, respondent, responsible development, rissa Mining Corporation Ltd, Supreme Court, Sustainable Development, tribal rights
Komal Ahuja Uncategorized bauxite mining, conservation principles, constitutional validity, Dongria Kondh, ecological integrity, environmental conservation, environmental ethics, environmental governance, FCA, Forest Conservation Act, Forest Rights Act, FRA, indigenous communities, industrial development, Landmark Judgment, Legal Framework, Legal Implications, Legal Precedents, Ministry Of Environment & Forest & Ors., Niyamgiri Hills, Odisha, Orissa Mining Corporation Ltd, Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, PESA, Supreme Court, traditional way of life, tribal rights
