Komal Ahuja Judicial Decisions, Kerala High Court, Legal Affairs administrative response, Animal Husbandry, animal welfare, ban, banned dog breeds, breed identification, breed-specific legislation, Calcutta High Court, circular, constitutional principles, controversy, Dairying Department, ferocious dog breeds, Fisheries, future course of action, implications, individual liberties, Judiciary, Justice T R Ravi, Karnataka High Court, Kerala High Court, legal challenge, legal precedent, Mastiffs, partial stay, Pitbull Terriers, policy implementation, public safety, responsible pet ownership, sterilization mandates, Union Ministry, Wolf Dogs, Writ Petition
Komal Ahuja Uncategorized Article 285, Constitutional Provisions, controversy, Custodian of Enemy Property, custodianship, enemy property, Enemy Property Act 1968, factual background, fiscal year 2024-2025, judgment, Justice Nagarathna, Kohli Brothers Colour Lab, Legal analysis, legal precedent, legal questions, Legal Representation, Lucknow Nagar Nigam, Ministry of Commerce, ownership, property tax, Supreme Court, Taxation, Union of India, UP Municipal Corporation Adhiniyam 1959
