Komal Ahuja Uncategorized biodiversity conservation, CBD, community consultations, community governance, Convention on Biological Diversity, economic development, environmental impact assessments, environmental jurisprudence, environmental responsibility, Forest Conservation Act, Forest Rights Act, global practices, Gram Sabha consent, inclusive development, India, indigenous rights, international environmental standards, judgment, legal frameworks, legal history, Ministry Of Environment & Forest, Orissa Mining Corporation Ltd, principles, Sustainable Development, sustainable future, traditional knowledge, UNDRIP, United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples
Komal Ahuja Uncategorized 21st century, balanced future, bauxite mining, conservation efforts, Constitutional Mandate, development interests, economic significance, environmental jurisprudence, environmental law, environmental standards, FCA, forest clearance, Forest Conservation Act, Forest Rights Act, FRA, inclusivity, indigenous rights, irreversible environmental impact, Legal analysis, legal arguments, legal decisions, legal frameworks, Legal Precedents, Ministry Of Environment & Forest & Ors., MOEF, Niyamgiri Hills, Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, PESA, petitioner, respondent, responsible development, rissa Mining Corporation Ltd, Supreme Court, Sustainable Development, tribal rights
Komal Ahuja Uncategorized 2006, biodiversity, cultural heritage, custodians, democratic decision-making, developmental projects, ecological balance, ecological sustainability, environmental conservation, environmental jurisprudence, equity., Forest Rights Act, FRA, Gram Sabha authority, Gram Sabhas, historical injustices, inclusive development, indigenous communities, indigenous knowledge, legal recognition, local governance, Ministry Of Environment & Forest & Ors., Orissa Mining Corporation Ltd, social identity, social justice, Supreme Court judgment, sustainable forest management, traditional rights, traditions, tribal rights
