Komal Ahuja Criminal Law, Judicial Decisions, Legal News, Supreme Court Admissibility of Confessional Statements, Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam Section 23(1), inadmissible evidence, Indian Evidence Act Section 25, Sanju Bansal v. State of Uttar Pradesh, Supreme Court ruling on confessional statements
Komal Ahuja Uncategorized anticipatory bail, Appeal, compliance, Condonation of Delay, confessional statements, criminal jurisprudence, custodial interrogation, Due Process, high court, inadmissible evidence, Indian Judiciary, Investigation, law enforcement, legal directive, Legal Integrity., legal precedent, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, Narcotics Control Bureau, narcotics-related statutes, prima facie evidence, procedural considerations, reaffirmation, rights of the accused., Supreme Court, Toofan Singh Judgment, Tramadol tablets seizure
