![supreme_court_rules_on_jurisdictional_conflict_fssa_takes_precedence_over_ipc_in_food_adulteration_cases Supreme Court Rules on Jurisdictional Conflict: FSSA Takes Precedence over IPC in Food Adulteration Cases](https://bhattandjoshiassociates.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/supreme_court_rules_on_jurisdictional_conflict_fssa_takes_precedence_over_ipc_in_food_adulteration_cases-1030x539-1200x628.jpg)
Overriding Effect
![supreme_court_rules_on_jurisdictional_conflict_fssa_takes_precedence_over_ipc_in_food_adulteration_cases Supreme Court Rules on Jurisdictional Conflict: FSSA Takes Precedence over IPC in Food Adulteration Cases](https://bhattandjoshiassociates.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/supreme_court_rules_on_jurisdictional_conflict_fssa_takes_precedence_over_ipc_in_food_adulteration_cases-1030x539-1200x628.jpg)
Komal Ahuja Uncategorized 273, Criminal Case, Food Adulteration, Food Safety, Food Safety and Standards Act, FSSA, Indian Penal Code, Intent, ipc, judicial interpretation, Jurisdictional Conflict, Legal Ruling, Overriding Effect, precedent, Quashing, Section 59, Section 89, Sections 272, Special Enactment, Specialized Approach, Specific Provisions, Standards, Stringency, Supreme Court