Komal Ahuja GST Law, Income Tax, Judicial Decisions Access to Justice, Accountability, appeal period, Appellate Authority, Calcutta High Court, CGST Act, Condonation of Delay, Goods and Services Tax, GST, judicial independence, Jurisprudence, Jyanata Ghosh v. State of West Bengal, Landmark Judgment, Legal Interpretation, Legal Principles, Limitation Act, natural justice principles, Order, precedent, procedural fairness, respondent, Rule of Law, Show Cause Notice, tax administration, violation
Komal Ahuja Judicial Decisions, Legal Affairs, Supreme Court Article 227 of the Constitution, Condonation of Delay, legal delay, limitation period, principles of limitation in India, procedural justice, procedural timeliness in legal proceedings, Supreme Court judgment on delay, Supreme Court of India, Union of India
Komal Ahuja Uncategorized anticipatory bail, Appeal, compliance, Condonation of Delay, confessional statements, criminal jurisprudence, custodial interrogation, Due Process, high court, inadmissible evidence, Indian Judiciary, Investigation, law enforcement, legal directive, Legal Integrity., legal precedent, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, Narcotics Control Bureau, narcotics-related statutes, prima facie evidence, procedural considerations, reaffirmation, rights of the accused., Supreme Court, Toofan Singh Judgment, Tramadol tablets seizure