Introduction
The Commercial Courts Act, 2015 represents a paradigm shift in India’s approach to resolving commercial disputes, introducing specialized courts and procedural reforms aimed at expediting litigation for high-value commercial matters. This landmark legislation substantially amended the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), creating a distinct legal framework for commercial disputes of specified value. The Act’s primary objective is to ensure speedy resolution of commercial disputes through streamlined procedures, strict timelines, and enhanced disclosure requirements [1].
The significance of this Act cannot be overstated in the context of India’s business environment. Prior to its enactment, commercial disputes were subject to the same procedural framework as ordinary civil suits, often resulting in prolonged litigation that undermined business confidence and economic growth. The Act addresses these concerns by establishing dedicated commercial courts, commercial divisions in High Courts, and introducing amendments to the CPC that specifically govern commercial litigation [2].
Historical Context and Legislative Framework
Genesis of the Commercial Courts Act
The Commercial Courts Act emerged from the recognition that India’s traditional civil procedure system was inadequate for addressing the complexities and urgency of modern commercial disputes. The Act, originally known as the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015, was subsequently amended in 2018 to expand its scope and effectiveness [3].
The Act came into force on October 23, 2015, and has since been implemented across various states in India. The legislation was further strengthened through amendments that reduced the specified value threshold from Rs. 1 crore to Rs. 3 lakhs, thereby bringing a larger number of commercial disputes within its ambit [4].
Constitutional and Statutory Framework
Section 16 of the Commercial Courts Act establishes its overriding effect over the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. This section explicitly states that where any provision of any rule of the jurisdictional High Court or any amendment to the CPC by the State Government conflicts with the provisions of the CPC as amended by the Act, the provisions of the CPC as amended by the Commercial Courts Act shall prevail [5]. This creates a hierarchy of legal norms that ensures uniformity in the application of commercial court procedures across different jurisdictions.
Jurisdiction and Specified Value
Determination of Commercial Courts’ Jurisdiction
The jurisdiction of commercial courts is primarily determined by the concept of “Specified Value,” which is defined under Section 2(1)(i) of the Act as the value of the subject-matter in respect of a suit as determined in accordance with Section 12, which shall not be less than three lakh rupees or such higher value as may be notified by the Central Government [6].
The 2018 amendment significantly expanded the Act’s reach by reducing the threshold from Rs. 1 crore to Rs. 3 lakhs. This change was implemented through Section 3(1-A), which allows state governments, after consultation with concerned High Courts, to specify pecuniary values not less than three lakh rupees for the whole or part of the state [7].
Types of Commercial Disputes
The Act provides an inclusive definition of commercial disputes under Section 2(c), encompassing ordinary transactions of merchants, bankers, financiers, and traders; export and import of goods and services; admiralty and maritime law issues; transactions involving aircraft and related equipment; carriage of goods; construction and infrastructure contracts; and intellectual property rights matters [8].
Amendments to the Code of Civil Procedure
Order VI: Pleadings and Verification Requirements
One of the most significant amendments introduced by the Commercial Courts Act relates to the verification of pleadings. The Act inserted Rule 15A in Order VI of the CPC, which mandates that every pleading in a commercial dispute shall be verified by an affidavit in the prescribed manner (Statement of Truth) [9].
Rule 15A specifically provides that notwithstanding anything contained in Rule 15 of Order VI, every pleading in a commercial dispute must be verified by an affidavit signed by the party or one of the parties to the proceedings, or by any other person who is proved to the satisfaction of the court to be acquainted with the facts of the case and authorized by such parties. In the absence of proper verification, the pleadings cannot be relied upon as evidence [10].
The Statement of Truth requires the person verifying the pleading to declare that they are sufficiently conversant with the facts of the case, have examined all relevant documents and records, and that the statements made are true to their knowledge or based on information received which they believe to be correct. The verification must also include a declaration that there is no false statement or concealment of any material fact, document, or record [11].
Order VIII: Written Statement and Timeline Modifications
The Act significantly modified the timelines for filing written statements in commercial disputes. While the original CPC provided for a maximum period of 90 days for filing written statements, the Commercial Courts Act extended this period to 120 days from the date of service of summons [12].
This amendment was incorporated through modifications to Order V and Order VIII of the CPC. Importantly, the Act includes a strict provision that no court shall extend the time period beyond 120 days, emphasizing the legislature’s intent to maintain strict timelines in commercial litigation [13].
Order XI: Disclosure, Discovery, and Inspection of Documents
Perhaps the most revolutionary change introduced by the Commercial Courts Act is the complete substitution of Order XI of the CPC for commercial disputes. The new Order XI mandates upfront disclosure of all documents in the possession, power, custody, or control of the parties at the time of filing the plaint or written statement [14].
Under the amended Order XI, Rule 1 requires the plaintiff to file a list of all documents and photocopies of all documents in its power, possession, control, or custody pertaining to the suit, along with the plaint. This includes documents referred to and relied upon by the plaintiff in the plaint, as well as documents relating to any matter in question in the proceedings, regardless of whether they support or are adverse to the plaintiff’s case [15].
The Rule further mandates that parties include a declaration on oath stating that they are not in possession of any documents other than the photocopies of the documents they have already placed on record. Parties are prohibited from relying on any documents other than those mentioned in the list and whose photocopies have been filed, without leave of the court [16].
Case Analysis: The Interplay of Order VI Rule 17 and Order XI
Facts and Legal Issues
The case analysis reveals the tension between the general provisions for amendment of pleadings under Order VI Rule 17 and the stringent disclosure requirements under the amended Order XI. In the case examined, the plaintiff sought to amend the plaint to include additional parking space claims and place on record documents that were admittedly in their possession at the time of filing the suit but were not originally disclosed [17].
The primary legal issue revolved around whether the stringent requirements of Order XI Rule 1(5) of the CPC, as amended by the Commercial Courts Act, would apply when a proposed amendment under Order VI Rule 17 seeks to place documents on record that were in the power, possession, control, or custody of the plaintiff at the time of filing the suit.
Arguments and Judicial Reasoning
The plaintiff argued that amendments should be governed solely by the classic test applicable under Order VI Rule 17, which generally allows amendments necessary for determining the real question in controversy between the parties. They contended that merely because the proposed amendment sought to place certain documents on record, the principles governing amendment of pleadings under Order VI Rule 17 should not cease to apply.
The defendants, however, argued that in commercial suits, placing additional documents on record that were in the plaintiff’s possession but not filed with the plaint can only be done after meeting the requirements of Order XI Rule 1(5), which requires establishing “reasonable cause” for non-disclosure. They contended that allowing such amendments would circumvent the rigor of Order XI as applicable to commercial suits.
Court’s Decision and Rationale
The court concluded that there is substance in the defendants’ contention that accepting the plaintiff’s argument would render the provisions of the Commercial Courts Act and the CPC as amended ineffective. The court emphasized that such an interpretation would render statutory provisions enacted with a clear object ineffective and otiose [18].
The court observed that in the context of commercial suits, the general provision of Order VI Rule 17 for amendment of pleadings must be read harmoniously with the provisions of the CPC specifically amended by the Commercial Courts Act, including Order XI. The court noted that it is a settled position of law that special statutes enacted later in point of time trump prior general statutes [19].
Regulatory Framework and Compliance Requirements
Pre-Institution Mediation
The Commercial Courts Act introduces Section 12A, which mandates pre-institution mediation in all commercial disputes, except in cases requiring urgent interim relief. This provision reflects the legislature’s emphasis on alternative dispute resolution as a means of reducing the burden on courts and achieving faster resolution of commercial disputes [20].
The mediation process is administered by authorities under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987. Parties seeking to initiate commercial litigation must first attempt resolution through mediation, filing an application in the prescribed form before the relevant legal services authority.
Summary Judgment Provisions
The Act introduces a novel concept of summary judgment through Order XIII-A of the CPC. This provision allows courts to decide claims without recording oral evidence in cases where the plaintiff has no real prospect of succeeding on the claim, the defendant has no real prospect of successfully defending the claim, or in the absence of any other compelling reason for recording oral evidence [21].
Applications for summary judgment can be made at any time after summons have been served on the defendant but not after the court has framed issues in the suit. This provision is designed to enable early disposal of cases where the merits are clear and do not require full trial proceedings.
Electronic Records and Evidence
The Commercial Courts Act incorporates provisions for electronic records and evidence, recognizing their importance in modern commercial transactions. The amended Order XI includes specific procedures for handling electronic documents, while maintaining the general evidentiary framework established under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, and the Information Technology Act, 2000 [22].
Judicial Interpretation and Precedential Value
Supreme Court Guidance on Amendment Principles
The Supreme Court has consistently emphasized that amendments under Order VI Rule 17 should be allowed liberally, provided they are necessary for determining the real questions in controversy and do not cause prejudice to the other party. However, in the context of commercial suits, courts must balance this liberal approach with the specific requirements imposed by the Commercial Courts Act [23].
In recent decisions, the Supreme Court has clarified that amendments introducing aspects necessary for deciding issues between parties should be permitted even if there is delay in filing the amendment application, provided due diligence was exercised and the aspect is essential for proper adjudication [24].
High Court Decisions and Interpretative Trends
Various High Courts have grappled with the interpretation of the Commercial Courts Act’s provisions. The Bombay High Court, in particular, has been at the forefront of developing jurisprudence around the interplay between Order VI Rule 17 and Order XI in commercial suits.
The Delhi High Court has clarified that the Commercial Courts Act’s provisions apply only once a suit relating to a commercial dispute is transferred to the commercial division, and not prior to that transfer. This interpretation has significant implications for the applicability of the Act’s stringent procedures [25].
Implications for Legal Practice
Strategic Considerations for Litigants
The Commercial Courts Act’s amendments have profound implications for litigation strategy in commercial disputes. Lawyers must now ensure complete upfront disclosure of all relevant documents, as the opportunity to introduce additional documents later in the proceedings is severely restricted.
The enhanced verification requirements under Rule 15A of Order VI also impose greater responsibility on parties and their legal representatives to ensure accuracy and completeness of pleadings. The Statement of Truth requirement creates potential consequences for false or misleading statements that go beyond traditional perjury provisions.
Impact on Case Management
The Act’s emphasis on strict timelines and case management has transformed the conduct of commercial litigation. Courts are required to endeavor to dispose of commercial suits within prescribed timeframes, with commercial appellate courts expected to dispose of appeals within six months of filing [26].
The mandatory case management hearing provisions enable courts to monitor progress closely and issue directions necessary for speedy disposal. This represents a significant departure from the traditionally more relaxed approach to case management in Indian civil litigation.
Contemporary Challenges and Future Directions
Enforcement and Implementation Issues
Despite the Act’s progressive provisions, implementation challenges remain. The success of the commercial courts system depends heavily on the availability of adequate infrastructure, trained judicial personnel, and supportive administrative systems. Several states have established dedicated commercial courts, but coverage remains uneven across the country [27].
The reduction in specified value threshold to Rs. 3 lakhs has significantly increased the caseload of commercial courts, potentially straining their capacity to achieve the intended speedier disposal of cases.
Harmonization with Other Legal Frameworks
The Commercial Courts Act must operate in harmony with other specialized legal frameworks, including the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and various sector-specific regulations. Courts have had to navigate complex jurisdictional questions and procedural conflicts arising from overlapping statutory frameworks.
Conclusion
The Commercial Courts Act, 2015, represents a transformative approach to commercial dispute resolution in India. Through its amendments to the Code of Civil Procedure, the Act has created a specialized procedural framework that emphasizes speed, efficiency, and transparency in commercial litigation.
The judicial interpretation of the Act’s provisions, particularly the interplay between Order VI Rule 17 and Order XI, demonstrates the courts’ commitment to balancing procedural fairness with the legislative intent of expeditious dispute resolution. The evolving jurisprudence around these provisions will continue to shape commercial litigation practice in India.
The Act’s success in achieving its objectives depends on continued judicial vigilance in maintaining the delicate balance between procedural efficiency and substantive justice. As commercial transactions become increasingly complex and cross-border in nature, the Commercial Courts Act provides a robust foundation for India’s commercial dispute resolution system.
The legislative framework established by the Act, combined with evolving judicial interpretation and practical implementation, positions India to better serve as a preferred destination for commercial investment and business operations. The emphasis on timely resolution of commercial disputes contributes to improved ease of doing business and enhanced investor confidence in India’s legal system.
References
[1] The Commercial Courts Act, 2015, Section 1, available at: https://nalsa.gov.in/the-commercial-courts-acts-rules/the-commercial-courts-acts
[2] Singhania & Partners, “Amendments made To CPC by the Commercial Courts Act, 2015,” available at: https://singhania.in/blog/amendments-made-to-cpc-by-the-commercial-courts-act-2015
[3] The Commercial Courts Act, 2015, Preamble and Section 2, available at: https://www.indiacode.nic.in/handle/123456789/2156
[4] Department of Justice, “Commercial Courts,” available at: https://dashboard.doj.gov.in/eodb/commcourts.html
[5] The Commercial Courts Act, 2015, Section 16, available at: https://nalsa.gov.in/the-commercial-courts-acts-rules/the-commercial-courts-acts
[6] The Commercial Courts Act, 2015, Section 2(1)(i), available at: https://nalsa.gov.in/the-commercial-courts-acts-rules/the-commercial-courts-acts
[7] Maheshwari & Co., “Jurisdiction Of Commercial Courts,” Mondaq, April 12, 2022, available at: https://www.mondaq.com/india/contracts-and-commercial-law/1182450/jurisdiction-of-commercial-courts
[8] The Commercial Courts Act, 2015, Section 2(c), available at: https://nalsa.gov.in/the-commercial-courts-acts-rules/the-commercial-courts-acts
[9] TaxGuru, “Verification of pleadings under CPC as amended by Commercial Courts Act, 2015,” November 15, 2021, available at: https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/verification-pleadings-cpc-amended-commercial-courts-act-2015.html
[10] The Commercial Courts Act, 2015, Schedule, Order VI Rule 15A, available at: https://nalsa.gov.in/the-commercial-courts-acts-rules/the-commercial-courts-acts
[11] TaxGuru, “Verification of pleadings under CPC as amended by Commercial Courts Act, 2015,” November 15, 2021, available at: https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/verification-pleadings-cpc-amended-commercial-courts-act-2015.html
[12] Lexology, “Amendments made to cpc by the commercial Courts Act, 2015,” July 3, 2020, available at: https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=067b26c9-f527-4495-baa4-fdb6d105607f
[13] The Commercial Courts Act, 2015, Schedule, Order VIII, available at: https://nalsa.gov.in/the-commercial-courts-acts-rules/the-commercial-courts-acts
[14] The Commercial Courts Act, 2015, Schedule, Order XI, available at: https://nalsa.gov.in/the-commercial-courts-acts-rules/the-commercial-courts-acts
[15] Mondaq, “Simplifying The Commercial Courts Act, 2015: II. Order XI,” December 6, 2023, available at: https://www.mondaq.com/india/civil-law/1398832/simplifying-the-commercial-courts-act-2015-ii-order-xi-disclosure-discovery-and-inspection-of-documents-in-suit-before-the-commercial-division-of-a-high-court-or-a-commercial-court
[16] Singhania & Partners, “Amendments made To CPC by the Commercial Courts Act, 2015,” available at: https://singhania.in/blog/amendments-made-to-cpc-by-the-commercial-courts-act-2015
Download Full Booklet: https://bhattandjoshiassociates.s3.ap-south-1.amazonaws.com/judgements/a2016-04 (1).pdf
