
Komal Ahuja Alternative Dispute Resolution, Arbitration Lawyers Arbitration Agreement, Arbitration Clauses, contract law, Contracts, Dispute Resolution, Incorporation, India, JUSTICE, Legal Interpretation, legal precedent, Legal Ruling, Supreme Court
Komal Ahuja Uncategorized balance, biases, credibility, Criminal Trial, defense, evidentiary integrity, fairness, impartiality, inconsistencies, investigative procedures, investigative standards, Judicial Scrutiny, JUSTICE, legal context, legal precedent, Legal Principles, Periyasamy v. State, Prosecution, Rule of Law, scrutiny, Supreme Court, Verdict, witness testimony
Komal Ahuja Uncategorized 1937, adjudication, Allahabad High Court, Article 15, Constitution Bench, constitutional issues, constitutional principles, Constitutional Rights, discrimination, equality, Indian Constitution, Legal Framework, Legal Intervention., legal precedent, legal reform, legal system, Muslim Personal (Shariat) Application Act, Muslim Personal Law, personal laws, PIL, polygamy, religious beliefs, religious communities, religious freedoms, religious pluralism, religious practices, Section 494 IPC, secularism, Supreme Court, Supreme Court's role, uniform civil code, validity
Komal Ahuja Uncategorized assessing officer authority, documentation, financial dealings, Income tax assessment, investor identity, Khyathi Steel Industries (P.) Ltd., legal precedent, long-term capital gain, material facts disclosure, Principal Commissioner of Income-tax, Rajshree Realtors (P.) Ltd., satisfactory explanation, section 68, Section 68 additions, share application money, shell companies, substantiation, Swetaben Ghanshyambhai Patel, tax imposition, taxation law, transaction genuineness, Transparency, undisclosed income, Union of India, unjust tax additions
Komal Ahuja Uncategorized 1980, 21st century challenges, biodiversity, collaborative effort, conservation principles, development projects, ecological integrity, economic development, economic imperatives, ecosystem, environmental conservation, environmental impact assessments, environmental safeguards, FCA, Forest Conservation Act, Forested regions, indigenous communities, legal instrument, Legal Landscape, legal precedent, Legal Scrutiny, Ministry Of Environment & Forest & Ors., natural heritage, Niyamgiri Hills, Orissa Mining Corporation Ltd, resilient society., responsible development, societal needs, Supreme Court judgment, Sustainable Development
Komal Ahuja Uncategorized 1954, 2006, Appellate Review, Article 20(1), Constitutional Interpretation, Constitutional Safeguard, Criminal Laws, Factual Matrix, Food Safety and Standards Act, Judicial Insight, Labeling Violation, Legal Adaptability, legal precedent, Lesser Punishment, Misbranding, New Laws, Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, Retrospective Legislation, Rule Violation, Sentencing Conversion, Supreme Court, T. Barai v. Henry Ah Hoe
Komal Ahuja Uncategorized Compassionate Approach, Criminal Cases, Culpable Homicide, Emotional Nuances, Fourth Exception, Humanitarian Considerations, Indian Penal Code, Judicial Modification, Justice and Humanity, legal precedent, Legal Reclassification, Legal Rigor, Murder, Spontaneous Act, Supreme Court, Tragic Incidents.
Komal Ahuja Uncategorized Consent, Counterblast Claims, Evolving Relationships, Human Dynamics., Inherent Improbability, Intimate Connections, Landmark Ruling, Legal Complexities, legal precedent, Ongoing Consent, Privacy, Quashing FIR, Relationship Dynamics, Societal Reflections, Supreme Court
Komal Ahuja Uncategorized Article 370, Black Day, Case Details, Celebration, constitution, Constitutional Values, Context, Criminal Appeal No. 886 of 2024, Critique, Definitive Verdict, Disharmony Concerns, Dissent, Dissent in Democracy, Freedom of Expression, Impact on Reasonable Individuals, Independence Day Wishes, Indian Penal Code, Intention, Jammu and Kashmir, Justices Abhay S Oka, Landmark Ruling, Legal analysis, legal precedent, Pakistan, Professor Javed Ahmed Hajam, Protecting Freedom of Expression, Religious Affiliation, Right to Freedom of Speech and Expression, Second WhatsApp Message, Section 153A Charges, Supreme Court, Ujjal Bhuyan, Upholding Democratic Values, WhatsApp Messages
Komal Ahuja Uncategorized anticipatory bail, Appeal, compliance, Condonation of Delay, confessional statements, criminal jurisprudence, custodial interrogation, Due Process, high court, inadmissible evidence, Indian Judiciary, Investigation, law enforcement, legal directive, Legal Integrity., legal precedent, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, Narcotics Control Bureau, narcotics-related statutes, prima facie evidence, procedural considerations, reaffirmation, rights of the accused., Supreme Court, Toofan Singh Judgment, Tramadol tablets seizure